jjgator posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
jjgator posted...
Square doesn't want to dumb it down to run on Switch.
That doesn't seem to stop DQXI, which happens to run on UE4 too.
Just because two different games run on the same engine doesn't mean they require the same horsepower to run.
Yet DQXI only hits 900p @ 30fps on PS4. If you're suggesting that FFVIIR is going to require more, then is that an assumption that it will only hit something like 720p @ 30fps on PS4?
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
|
doutforharambe posted...
It never really made sense to put cloud in smash. He made more sense in ps all stars. At least with snake there was that twin snakes game on gamecube.
They did it to settle the age old debate of Cloud vs Link
the end of one nightmare, prelude to the another...
Shenmue III
|
DiscostewSM posted...
jjgator posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
jjgator posted...
Square doesn't want to dumb it down to run on Switch.
That doesn't seem to stop DQXI, which happens to run on UE4 too.
Just because two different games run on the same engine doesn't mean they require the same horsepower to run.
Yet DQXI only hits 900p @ 30fps on PS4.
And how does it run on the Switch, especially undocked?
If you're suggesting that FFVIIR is going to require more, then is that an assumption that it will only hit something like 720p @ 30fps on PS4?
There are aspects to the game aside from resolution. RAM usage, CPU usage, all can play into the potential for a game running on certain hardware, and how much it needs to be downgraded to run on lesser hardware. Halo 4 most assuredly required more resources than Halo 3, yet it also ran at a higher resolution (and often framerate) on the same hardware. It's entirely possible, and very probable, that Final Fantasy 7 Remake will require more resources than Dragon Quest XI, but run at the same resolution and framerate on the PS4..
"Walking tanks must exist somewhere for there to be such attention to detail like this in mech sim." - IGN Steel Battalion review
|
Solis posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
jjgator posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
jjgator posted...
Square doesn't want to dumb it down to run on Switch.
That doesn't seem to stop DQXI, which happens to run on UE4 too.
Just because two different games run on the same engine doesn't mean they require the same horsepower to run.
Yet DQXI only hits 900p @ 30fps on PS4.
And how does it run on the Switch, especially undocked?
If you're suggesting that FFVIIR is going to require more, then is that an assumption that it will only hit something like 720p @ 30fps on PS4?
There are aspects to the game aside from resolution. RAM usage, CPU usage, all can play into the potential for a game running on certain hardware, and how much it needs to be downgraded to run on lesser hardware. Halo 4 most assuredly required more resources than Halo 3, yet it also ran at a higher resolution (and often framerate) on the same hardware. It's entirely possible, and very probable, that Final Fantasy 7 Remake will require more resources than Dragon Quest XI, but run at the same resolution and framerate on the PS4..
My point is that it's not accurate to claim that SE doesn't want to dumb down games for Switch when it already appears that games are being dumbed down via downgrading for it from them.
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
|
Solis posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
jjgator posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
jjgator posted...
Square doesn't want to dumb it down to run on Switch.
That doesn't seem to stop DQXI, which happens to run on UE4 too.
Just because two different games run on the same engine doesn't mean they require the same horsepower to run.
Yet DQXI only hits 900p @ 30fps on PS4.
And how does it run on the Switch, especially undocked?
If you're suggesting that FFVIIR is going to require more, then is that an assumption that it will only hit something like 720p @ 30fps on PS4?
There are aspects to the game aside from resolution. RAM usage, CPU usage, all can play into the potential for a game running on certain hardware, and how much it needs to be downgraded to run on lesser hardware. Halo 4 most assuredly required more resources than Halo 3, yet it also ran at a higher resolution (and often framerate) on the same hardware. It's entirely possible, and very probable, that Final Fantasy 7 Remake will require more resources than Dragon Quest XI, but run at the same resolution and framerate on the PS4..
It's called optimization, the more experience the developer has with the system, the more optimized they can get with coding for it, making for a more pleasant experience.
NNID: HTakara82 - Add me if you're looking for a good time, lol
NS FC: SW-6233-5661-0820
|
Let me know when they actually decide what studio is going to make this abomination before i start to pretend to give a s***.
"The Xbox One board isn't the place for personal anecdotes, joke topics or fanboy affair." -Gamefaqs Moderator
|
NeoMonk posted...
Let me know when they actually decide what studio is going to make this abomination before i start to pretend to give a s***.
we'll know in 2 yrs lol
NNID: HTakara82 - Add me if you're looking for a good time, lol
NS FC: SW-6233-5661-0820
|
DiscostewSM posted...
My point is that it's not accurate to claim that SE doesn't want to dumb down games for Switch when it already appears that games are being dumbed down via downgrading for it from them.
I don't see what that has to do with the Switch. The studio making Dragon Quest games is obviously not the studio making Final Fantasy games, so how does that relate to the possibility of downgrading an in-development game for lesser hardware? It's not like Final Fantasy XV, ANY of the Kingdom Hearts games or their remasters, or Final Fantasy XII Zodiac Age were released on Switch, after all. Especially when the Final Fantasy 7 remake hasn't even been announced for the Xbox One yet, so assuming anything about their intentions with the game (particularly regarding a system like the Swtich) seems like a pretty big stretch. HayashiTakara posted...
It's called optimization, the more experience the developer has with the system, the more optimized they can get with coding for it, making for a more pleasant experience.
Absolutely. So what should we expect from the developers working on the Final Fantasy games if they were suddenly required to make them for the Switch when they have no experience working with the hardware, after having 4+ years of working on the Xbox One/PS4?
"Walking tanks must exist somewhere for there to be such attention to detail like this in mech sim." - IGN Steel Battalion review
|
Solis posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
My point is that it's not accurate to claim that SE doesn't want to dumb down games for Switch when it already appears that games are being dumbed down via downgrading for it from them.
I don't see what that has to do with the Switch. The studio making Dragon Quest games is obviously not the studio making Final Fantasy games, so how does that relate to the possibility of downgrading an in-development game for lesser hardware? It's not like Final Fantasy XV, ANY of the Kingdom Hearts games or their remasters, or Final Fantasy XII Zodiac Age were released on Switch, after all.
Especially when the Final Fantasy 7 remake hasn't even been announced for the Xbox One yet, so assuming anything about their intentions with the game (particularly regarding a system like the Swtich) seems like a pretty big stretch.
HayashiTakara posted...
It's called optimization, the more experience the developer has with the system, the more optimized they can get with coding for it, making for a more pleasant experience.
Absolutely. So what should we expect from the developers working on the Final Fantasy games if they were suddenly required to make them for the Switch when they have no experience working with the hardware, after having 4+ years of working on the Xbox One/PS4?
easy, they'll bring in people from the dragon quest team to assist, as they're getting a ton of experience with the switch with how many DQ games is coming out for it. it's not like the teams are inclusive.
NNID: HTakara82 - Add me if you're looking for a good time, lol
NS FC: SW-6233-5661-0820
|
DiscostewSM posted...
jjgator posted...
Square doesn't want to dumb it down to run on Switch.
That doesn't seem to stop DQXI, which happens to run on UE4 too.
Just because the Switch can run UE4 it doesn't mean it can run all games using UE4. DQXI on PS4 is in no way a technically impressive title. Unless Square-Enix is trying to make Switch consoles explode worldwide, FF7R isn't coming. It's a garbage remake that doesn't respect the original anyway, so it doesn't matter.
|
It'll be released in time for Switch 3. Maybe.
Any information provided on GFaqs can and will be used against you as bullying material.
If you keep talking about me, I will keep pointing out your obsession.
|
It's coming to Playstation first. Whether that means it will get a PC or Xbox port later is a different story. Besides it isn't even guaranteed to be coming to the PS4. The game will be broken into parts presumably 3 since Kitase/Nomura stated it will be full games in the same sense as the FFXIII trilogy. Part 1 isn't coming out no earlier than 2019 and that's being optimistic. The PS5 will probably be launching roughly late 2019. Part 2 and Part 3 will definitely be long after the PS5 got release. So it's highly plausible they might just dump the PS4 in favor of the PS5 just like what they did with Versus/XV when it went from the PS3 to the PS4. Even if part 1 is releasing only on the PS4 at first it will be coming to the PS5 within a few months to a year. Either way they would have to do a massive downgrade of an AAA PS4 and/or possibly PS5 game like FFVII-R. FFX/X-2 HD, Type 0 HD, FFXII TZA, FFXIII trilogy, and even FFXIV are more likely to be ported than FFVII-R (and parts) and even FFXV.
"Your arms are too short to box with God!"
|
Square seems to be pretty concerned with pushing the best graphics they possibly can at all times for their main titles, so I doubt they'd want to put in the work to make what they'd see as an inferior version.
|
Putting Cloud in Smash was not a "favor" to Square Enix. It's called a business deal.
"You can almost taste how much the Bubsy 3D makers hated the children of America," from Seanbaby's review of Bubsy 3D (EGM #150)
|
gafemaqs posted...
This topic is about when or if it is coming to Nintendo's console
Really? *looks at topic title* *sees a different statement* So either you're a liar, or you fail at logic.
I'm trolling the Nintendo Switch board almost exclusively now - N_Guy_N exposing himself
Google is not a reliable site - N_Guy_N trying to save face
|
Switch is far from a dog turd to have that overrated garbage. inb4 salty fanboy sheep crying
Sonic 3 and Knuckles is still and always will be the best game of all time.
The Cat is always right. You have yet to understand the feline language.
|
(Topic Creator)13 hours ago#67
Catluver17 posted...
Switch is far from a dog turd to have that overrated garbage.
inb4 salty fanboy sheep crying
I agree. But why?
|
(Topic Creator)12 hours ago#68
Katon posted...
Putting Cloud in Smash was not a "favor" to Square Enix. It's called a business deal.
I don't think you know what "favor" means.
fa·vor
noun
1. approval, support, or liking for someone or something.
"the legislation is viewed with favor"
synonyms:approval, approbation, goodwill, kindness, benevolence
|
Hayas***akara posted...
Solis posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
jjgator posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
jjgator posted...
Square doesn't want to dumb it down to run on Switch.
That doesn't seem to stop DQXI, which happens to run on UE4 too.
Just because two different games run on the same engine doesn't mean they require the same horsepower to run.
Yet DQXI only hits 900p @ 30fps on PS4.
And how does it run on the Switch, especially undocked?
If you're suggesting that FFVIIR is going to require more, then is that an assumption that it will only hit something like 720p @ 30fps on PS4?
There are aspects to the game aside from resolution. RAM usage, CPU usage, all can play into the potential for a game running on certain hardware, and how much it needs to be downgraded to run on lesser hardware. Halo 4 most assuredly required more resources than Halo 3, yet it also ran at a higher resolution (and often framerate) on the same hardware. It's entirely possible, and very probable, that Final Fantasy 7 Remake will require more resources than Dragon Quest XI, but run at the same resolution and framerate on the PS4..
It's called optimization, the more experience the developer has with the system, the more optimized they can get with coding for it, making for a more pleasant experience.
You can optimize as much as you want but if the hardware is a piece of s*** then it will still run like s***.
the end of one nightmare, prelude to the another...
Shenmue III
|
gafemaqs posted...
Even after Nintendo did square the favor of putting Cloud in Smash, they're not bringing FF7 Remake to Switch?
!
Sakurai putting Cloud into Smash Bros didnt do ANYBODY any favours...
"Besides the multiplatforms and exclusives, what else was there on PS4?" - Karmic Dragon2003
|
Mr_Big_Boss posted...
doutforharambe posted...
It never really made sense to put cloud in smash. He made more sense in ps all stars. At least with snake there was that twin snakes game on gamecube.
They did it to settle the age old debate of Cloud vs Link
Link has been on Soulcalibur, where has Cloud been?
Demon EYES Kyo
Kyoshiro Mibu
|
gafemaqs posted...
doutforharambe posted...
It never really made sense to put cloud in smash. He made more sense in ps all stars. At least with snake there was that twin snakes game on gamecube.
I agree. Final Fantasy, despite being on NES originally, is typically associated with Sony.
Not this stubborn mentality again.
Not a native english speaker - Post-ALBW Zelda detractor - If you're not a Metroid fan and don't give any form of support to it, you are my enemy
|
Why the f*** do you want Final Fantasy 7 to be a stain on the Switch's library?
I've never seen anything this beautiful in the entire galaxy... All right, give me the bomb. -Ultra Magnus
|
Sony moneyhatted timed exclusivity for one. Switch probably can't run it. Won't be ready for a couple years, so likely PS5 title. Save your port begging for Switch 2.
Warning: the post you just read may contain satire, hyperbole, or deadpan. Reader digression is advised.
|
Smash or not, it's still a Sony game through and through. I can't see it coming over anytime soon.
3DS FC: 0705-2213-8367
FE14 MC Address: 06522-09932-36503-79745
|
Cause it sucks, even ffx is better.
people are still hyped about that 90's game?
|
gafemaqs posted...
This topic is about when or if it is coming to Nintendo's console
Well, its not... so not really sure what else you want people to tell you.
|
Avocado posted...
Given that Final Fantasy 15 isn't coming to the Switch due to technical restraints and Final Fantasy 7 Remake is based off the same engine, I highly doubt the remake will come to the Switch.
FFXV was made on their own Luminous Engine. FFVII and KH3 is being made with Unreal Engine 4.
|
because the switch wouldn't have a hope in hell of running it?
Just shut the hell up and talk about games, im so tired of the politics of gaming...
|
You do know it's a PS4 timed exclusive lmao
Final Fantasy XV is a terrible game with awful characters
|
Technickal1 posted...
Smash or not, it's still a Sony game through and through. I can't see it coming over anytime soon.
A Sony game which also came out on PC. Try again.
Not a native english speaker - Post-ALBW Zelda detractor - If you're not a Metroid fan and don't give any form of support to it, you are my enemy
|
Thrasher7170 posted...
Link01588 posted...
Like FFVIIR is actually coming out anytime soon. That game will be in development hell for a long time.
This. By the time it drops, it'll be a PS5 title.
FC: 1977 - 0616 - 0040
Gallant was here
|
Blitz_kid_ posted...
You do know it's a PS4 timed exclusive lmao
Will it EVER release though? The game might be good, although several other entries in the FF series is MUCH better imho. That release of FF 12 or XII, was great, that game was actually good. I don't see why part 7 has such an audience tbh, since it's so bad compared to other entries in the series. FF6 is much better for example.
|
You're delusional if you think the Switch can run that
|
There was never any chance that FF7R was coming to Switch. It was always 0. Just like it was 0 for Wii U.
|
Nordini posted...
There was never any chance that FF7R was coming to Switch. It was always 0. Just like it was 0 for Wii U.
That negativity could be bad for your heart.
|
GooberSD posted...
You're delusional if you think the Switch can run that
But it actually could. it's a matter of battery life.
|
It really boils down to whatever "timed exclusivity" means for PS4, and whether or not the developer has any interest in porting it over to the Switch after the fact.
Heck, we may be on Switch 2 before this game releases, so bickering back and forth about it will it / won't it is just pointless. It doesn't matter what we think, it matters what the developers think.
|
I don't care if it comes out on Switch or not because there's no way I'm going to buy a Switch version over a PS4 one. The reason why is simple: the PS4 Pro will play the game at a much higher resolution and frame rate. I really don't see why I'd favor the Switch for multiplatform games when I have a 65" 2160p OLED HDTV.
I'm French speaking.
27/Male/Quebec
|
RockrrGirrl19 posted...
Blitz_kid_ posted...
You do know it's a PS4 timed exclusive lmao
Will it EVER release though?
The game might be good, although several other entries in the FF series is MUCH better imho.
That release of FF 12 or XII, was great, that game was actually good. I don't see why part 7 has such an audience tbh, since it's so bad compared to other entries in the series.
FF6 is much better for example.
Um OK thanks for your feedback
finally a new .Hack game! its been too long old friend.
|
6-19-7 posted...
Technickal1 posted...
Smash or not, it's still a Sony game through and through. I can't see it coming over anytime soon.
A Sony game which also came out on PC.
Try again.
Wouldn't be the first Sony game on PC. Sony has published games on PC before
finally a new .Hack game! its been too long old friend.
|
YellowThunder posted...
It's never coming to any system.
PSN/steam: classicviolence Switch FC: 441991068406 3DS: 087719974865
Gamefaqs: Home of mod-alts, shills, sock puppets, and mentally ill trolls
|
king_madden posted...
RockrrGirrl19 posted...
Blitz_kid_ posted...
You do know it's a PS4 timed exclusive lmao
Will it EVER release though?
The game might be good, although several other entries in the FF series is MUCH better imho.
That release of FF 12 or XII, was great, that game was actually good. I don't see why part 7 has such an audience tbh, since it's so bad compared to other entries in the series.
FF6 is much better for example.
Um OK thanks for your feedback
No argument against what I just said?
|
gafemaqs posted...
Kaeporo posted...
Switch isn't strong enough for the remake of that mediocre game.
I agree the game is pretty lame, but Switch could run it if they make it a less demanding game to run
Bwahahahahaha Troll confirmed
I got 99 problems but a Switch aint one!
|
RockrrGirrl19 posted...
GooberSD posted...
You're delusional if you think the Switch can run that
But it actually could.
it's a matter of battery life.
How does battery life affect this? Hahahaha The Switch cannot run it. It has half the power (At best) that the PS4 has: http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinion/nintendo-switch-vs-ps4-and-xbox-one-2949935
|
(Topic Creator)3 hours ago#96
scorpio man posted...
gafemaqs posted...
Kaeporo posted...
Switch isn't strong enough for the remake of that mediocre game.
I agree the game is pretty lame, but Switch could run it if they make it a less demanding game to run
Bwahahahahaha
Troll confirmed
I know your fanboy mentality makes you delusional, but did you read more than the topic title before you posted? Actually, I know you didn't.
|
why the EFF dont you own both systems like 90% of 3DS/switch owners?
Demon EYES Kyo
Kyoshiro Mibu
|
(Topic Creator)3 hours ago#98
Kyoshiro12345 posted...
why the EFF dont you own both systems like 90% of 3DS/switch owners?
I do? I already said I don't like the game so I'm not getting it no matter what. Why are you so presumptuous? Why do you only read the topic title before posting?
|
gafemaqs posted...
scorpio man posted...
gafemaqs posted...
Kaeporo posted...
Switch isn't strong enough for the remake of that mediocre game.
I agree the game is pretty lame, but Switch could run it if they make it a less demanding game to run
Bwahahahahaha
Troll confirmed
I know your fanboy mentality makes you delusional, but did you read more than the topic title before you posted?
Actually, I know you didn't.
How could he have not read more than the topic title if he quoted a post???
|
GooberSD posted...
gafemaqs posted...
scorpio man posted...
gafemaqs posted...
Kaeporo posted...
Switch isn't strong enough for the remake of that mediocre game.
I agree the game is pretty lame, but Switch could run it if they make it a less demanding game to run
Bwahahahahaha
Troll confirmed
I know your fanboy mentality makes you delusional, but did you read more than the topic title before you posted?
Actually, I know you didn't.
How could he have not read more than the topic title if he quoted a post???
you new here?
"Besides the multiplatforms and exclusives, what else was there on PS4?" - Karmic Dragon2003
|
(edited 21 minutes ago)gafemaqs posted...
No comments:
Post a Comment