Search

Showing posts with label Backwards compatibility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Backwards compatibility. Show all posts

Thursday, August 3, 2017

Developers should stop making saves non-backward compatible

  1. Boards
  2. PlayStation 4
  3. Developers should stop making saves non-backward compatible
It has happened far too many times with me now.

I have overall two ps4's. One at my current place and other in my hometown (different country - my younger bro uses it when he is home).
My hometown has horrible internet speed so I no need to even think of playing online or downloading updates.

Whenever I go to my home for month or two, I take game saves on USB and try to resume them on other ps4.
But soo many games don't even accept a save game from newer version on old version of game installation.

They should stop doing this.
I know posting here won't help, but just want to know if there are others here facing similar problem..
(edited 1 day ago)quote
You'd need some might chunky sava data for it to allow for support for various patch levels and content discrepancies. The saves themselves would almost need to be standalone games or they could just use magic since that's the only your little issue would ever be solved.
It's geeks who really make or break a TV show or movie or videogame.
(edited 1 day ago)quote
nihilist212 1 day ago#3
So because YOU have this "issue", everything should change? 

Ok guy.
First comes smiles, then lies. Last is gunfire.
Kino 1 day ago#4
It causes a lot of technical and logical problems. Not going to happen.
What you are asking is almost impossible.
PSN: Shadowstrike002. Currently playing: FF12,undertale,Digimon new order
https://psnprofiles.com/ShadowStrike002
Alltra 1 day ago#6
There's a better solution:

They should just stop patching games.
The meaning of life is to suffer and be miserable.
Online is the worst thing to happen to gaming.
kyncani 1 day ago#7
Your best bet when moving between different places would be a handheld, a phone or a laptop IMO.
Alltra posted...
There's a better solution:

They should just stop patching games.


This is 2017, not 1917. Software and hardware will get patches. Also, the TC's issue applies to any form of content that has been added to the base game. Any change would render a save useless without said change.
It's geeks who really make or break a TV show or movie or videogame.
frost014 1 day ago#9
Can't you use an external? I haven't used one but maybe you can copy the updated game data on your ps4 to your external and use it on the other one?
Currently playing: Toukiden 2, Shadow of Mordor, Disgaea 5
Alltra 1 day ago#10
Should stop changing games too. I really do miss the days when a game would release, as is, and that was the end of it.
The meaning of life is to suffer and be miserable.
Online is the worst thing to happen to gaming.
Doyen 1 day ago#11
cool-aquarian posted...
It has happened far too many times with me now.

I have overall two ps4's. One at my current place and other in my hometown (different country - my younger bro uses it when he is home).
My hometown has horrible internet speed so I no need to even think of playing online or downloading updates.

Whenever I go to my home for month or two, I take game saves on USB and try to resume them on other ps4.
But soo many games don't even accept a save game from newer version on old version of game installation.

They should stop doing this.
I know posting here won't help, but just want to know if there are others here facing similar problem..


Simple. Download the update onto another USB drive and update the PS4 in the other country. I know; mind blown.
Alltra posted...
Should stop changing games too. I really do miss the days when a game would release, as is, and that was the end of it.

Yeah, the sweet days of games so buggy they're not broken but shattered.
First comes smiles, then lies. Last is gunfire.
Lollybomb 1 day ago#13
nihilist212 posted...
Alltra posted...
Should stop changing games too. I really do miss the days when a game would release, as is, and that was the end of it.

Yeah, the sweet days of games so buggy they're not broken but shattered.

Yep, and if they did patch anything, you had to pay full price for that patch.

Doyen posted...
Simple. Download the update onto another USB drive and update the PS4 in the other country. I know; mind blown.

Yeah, my mind is blown that you've figured out how to download game patches onto USB. Something Sony doesn't allow.
I would, but it violates an axiom I live by.
Never do anything phenomenally stupid.
(edited 1 day ago)quote
Alltra 1 day ago#14
nihilist212 posted...
Yeah, the sweet days of games so buggy they're not broken but shattered.


How many games exactly were like that? Cause I don't remember seeing a hell of a lot of games that were buggy to the point of being broken. The ones that were broken were so fucking awful that the bugs were the LEAST of their issues.
The meaning of life is to suffer and be miserable.
Online is the worst thing to happen to gaming.
rafamaximo 1 day ago#15
Dude, what you are asking is simply not feasible at all. Too many work, time and money spent on something that is simply NOT the standard and will NOT be used by 99,99% of gamers. 

You would be better off taking your own PS4 with you back home or simply trying to update your backup PS4 at home somehow.

Curious though (as I'm not from US too), where are you from?
Insert funny / cool / original / meaningful quote here.
Foppe 1 day ago#16
The first revision of Final Fantasy VI could crash if you used Relms Sketch attack.
The DOS port of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles got a gap that you cant pass without using a cheatcode, which they never fixed.
The Atari 2600 port of Impossible Mission got an item that you need to pick up in order to open the last door behind the locked door.
et Set Willy, which was a big game back in the days, got a memory leak that killed you in some rooms that you need to pass. The programmer lied about it being poison gas a couple of years before confessing that it was a glitch.
Donkey Kong, Dig Dug, Pac-man all got killscreens, which are impossible to beat levels.
Duck Hunt for Nes got a killscreen where the birds are flying too fast to be shot.

Etc etc.
GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC
I'm going to disagree with TC on this one. What you're asking for is forwards compatibility, which is not only an unreasonable expectation in terms of technical implementation, it's also going to be an incredibly rare problem and therefore not worth the developer effort. When you download a game or an update, you cannot revert to an earlier version, so this only applies to people using 2 consoles, 1 of which has no internet. How rare must that be? You can't reasonably expect a newer versions save file to work on an older version of the game, when the older version knows nothing about how the game or the save file may have changed, what new features may have been added, what scripts may have been modified, etc.

OTOH, if the complaint was actually about backwards compatibility of saves, e.g. when a dev releases a GOTY type version of the game and it won't read the saves from the original game (I think Witcher 3 did this?), that is BS.
Put. That coffee. Down. Coffee's for closers only.
(edited 1 day ago)quote
Alltra posted...
nihilist212 posted...
Yeah, the sweet days of games so buggy they're not broken but shattered.


How many games exactly were like that? Cause I don't remember seeing a hell of a lot of games that were buggy to the point of being broken. The ones that were broken were so fucking awful that the bugs were the LEAST of their issues.

Most games today aren't broken either, that's the problem. Patches exist to fix all sorts of various issues, the vast majority of which don't remotely come close to breaking a game, but people love to spout bullshit about broken games.

Don't know how old you are, but just about every single NES game EVER is riddled with bugs. Games throughout history really with miserable frame drops, tearing, games freezing, saves vanishing, the list goes on and on and on.
First comes smiles, then lies. Last is gunfire.
NettoSaito 1 day ago#19
That's not how save files work. A simple example of a file is something like this

[Inventory]
Item=0
Quantity=0

Item=0 would be the first slot in the inventory, with the 0 being the ID of the item in that slot. In this case 0 being nothing. Now what if item ID 38462 is a DLC item that is now in place. How do you expect a game to read a save file with an ID of something that doesn't exist in the version you are playing on? Other DLC may even add their own new sections to the save file, or greatly alter how the save is laid out.

In short it's not really something you can convert backwards without making a new file. Which is exactly what you have to do.
PSN/XBL/NN - NettoSaito | 3DS - [1203-9218-7780]
Netto's Game Room - Reviews and what not - http://www.nettosgameroom.com
huyi 1 day ago#20
cool-aquarian posted...
It has happened far too many times with me now.

I have overall two ps4's. One at my current place and other in my hometown (different country - my younger bro uses it when he is home).
My hometown has horrible internet speed so I no need to even think of playing online or downloading updates.

Whenever I go to my home for month or two, I take game saves on USB and try to resume them on other ps4.
But soo many games don't even accept a save game from newer version on old version of game installation.

They should stop doing this.
I know posting here won't help, but just want to know if there are others here facing similar problem..


yeah these patches lock your save file behind previous patch versions so if you roll back and delete the game data and try to reload your save they will not work, what's even worse is if you play on a console with internet, update the game and then play without internet with game data v1.0 later you can never load those saves again as they will not work.

i don't think they will ever stop doing this either, what i do is copy the previous save before updating to another usb drive and then update so i can always roll back, maybe that is a idea that you can do but you have to take note which save file to load and from which drive, it is awkward doing this though.

Alltra posted...
There's a better solution:

They should just stop patching games.


not just stop but to stop the aggressive patching/ large patch sizes, they break too much things more than they fix them and your saves is a huge issue too.
UK Female Gamer
Who needs special edition consoles when you have this --> http://tinyurl.com/jxaf4j4 You don't have to buy it, it's optional m'kay.
(edited 1 day ago)quote
Alltra 21 hours ago#21
Patches would be fine if all they did was fix glitches. But when they go in and tweak mechanics in the name of balance, aka nerfs, or something in a similar vein, you're fundamentally changing what the game is. 

Some glitches don't need fixing either. Some, like the Bottomless Box Glitch in DkS, or the Vanish glitch in FFVI, are beneficial and enhance the game, even if they were unintentional.
The meaning of life is to suffer and be miserable.
Online is the worst thing to happen to gaming.
huyi 21 hours ago#22
Alltra posted...
Patches would be fine if all they did was fix glitches. But when they go in and tweak mechanics in the name of balance, aka nerfs, or something in a similar vein, you're fundamentally changing what the game is. 

Some glitches don't need fixing either. Some, like the Bottomless Box Glitch in DkS, or the Vanish glitch in FFVI, are beneficial and enhance the game, even if they were unintentional.


and to add to this, when they fix the exploits they still leave the game buggy and broken, it's like their upmost priority to fix the exploits first before they fix the bugs which is the whole point in the patches in the first place, this aggressive approach especially when they nerf weapons and items can be game breaking in some cases.
UK Female Gamer
Who needs special edition consoles when you have this --> http://tinyurl.com/jxaf4j4 You don't have to buy it, it's optional m'kay.
Alltra 17 hours ago#23
It's ultimately futile as well, because no matter how hard they try, they can't ever remove every exploit. Many times, the attempt creates new, sometimes worse exploits.

This whole situation reminds me of something my art teacher said to us in High School:

"Seeking perfection ruins the work"

As he explained it, there's always a flaw in any work. Scrutinizing your work for flaws, or trying to add more to it in an attempt to make it better, tends to ruin the work.
The meaning of life is to suffer and be miserable.
Online is the worst thing to happen to gaming.
(edited 17 hours ago)quote
SaveRem 17 hours ago#24
Is always been like that, there is prob something important for that
huyi 1 hour ago#25
Alltra posted...
It's ultimately futile as well, because no matter how hard they try, they can't ever remove every exploit. Many times, the attempt creates new, sometimes worse exploits.

This whole situation reminds me of something my art teacher said to us in High School:

"Seeking perfection ruins the work"

As he explained it, there's always a flaw in any work. Scrutinizing your work for flaws, or trying to add more to it in an attempt to make it better, tends to ruin the work.


LOL you should give this advice to game devs, spot on.
UK Female Gamer
Who needs special edition consoles when you have this --> http://tinyurl.com/jxaf4j4 You don't have to buy it, it's optional m'kay.
  1. Boards
  2. PlayStation 4 
  3. Developers should stop making saves non-backward compatible

Friday, July 21, 2017

Has backwards compatibility helped sell Xbox One consoles?

  1. Boards
  2. Xbox One
  3. Has backwards compatibility helped sell Xbox One consoles?
Gunvalkyrie2 3 days ago#1
Has backwards compatibility helped sell Xbox One consoles? - Results (202 votes)
Yes, it's a nice feature.
55.94%
113
No, it's a non factor for current owners only.
24.75%
50
Hard to say.
19.31%
39
Do you know anyone who bought an x1 over ps4 based on bc? I do.
#BanBlobboyendings
I think MS's attitude of "a Steam-like library" should be a selling feature, especially compared to Sony's "buy it again and again!" approach.
"message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888
zombody 3 days ago#3
Over a ps4? No, but I have friends who finally decided to buy an Xbox One as well because of it. I'm also pretty damn happy with it too.
This George Carlin quote sums up Meta Critic..."Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups"
kingpin66636 3 days ago#4
It is a huge bonus but it's not the sole reason
...Goldberg's about to suplex the undertaker!! But wait...what's that? Oh my god, it's a provisional account with a steel chair! - Elemayowe
kyncani 3 days ago#5
You think Xbox One would have sold less if it didn't have BC ?
holden4ever 3 days ago#6
Babbit55 3 days ago#7
So at this point maybe not, though as time goes on and IF Sony do not pick up BC as well then Microsoft will be able to pitch an upgraded console with a huge library of games you already own. If you are moving to the next gen of consoles and you have 2 choices what would you pick?

Console with all your current games and accessories playable, and all the latest games too 

or

Console with a handful of release games and nothing else.
punisher1379 3 days ago#8
holden4ever posted...
I'm sure at least one person bought one because it had BC.


I did. You can never go wrong with BC.
Top 3:
Metroid Prime, Xenoblade Chronicles, The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons
ArsenicSteel 3 days ago#9
punisher1379 posted...
holden4ever posted...
I'm sure at least one person bought one because it had BC.


I did. You can never go wrong with BC.


BC added 100 bucks to the cost of the og PS3. Sony struggle to sell those fat units.
It's geeks who really make or break a TV show or movie or videogame.
ArsenicSteel posted...
punisher1379 posted...
holden4ever posted...
I'm sure at least one person bought one because it had BC.


I did. You can never go wrong with BC.


BC added 100 bucks to the cost of the og PS3. Sony struggle to sell those fat units.


I am referring to how Microsoft handled it. In this case, you are not paying extra and you are getting a very nice feature. I picked up my Xbox One S on sale online for $190, with no tax and free shipping.
Top 3:
Metroid Prime, Xenoblade Chronicles, The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons
(edited 3 days ago)quote
Billo 3 days ago#11
I'm sure it convinced at least some people to pick up an XB1, maybe not over a PS4 but in addition to it.
But is it a feature that can sell enough console to really matter in the grand scheme of things. I'd have to go with a hard no.
It helped my decision to get a 'bone, so yeah
SOMEONE GET ON THE POINT
punisher1379 posted...
ArsenicSteel posted...
punisher1379 posted...
holden4ever posted...
I'm sure at least one person bought one because it had BC.


I did. You can never go wrong with BC.


BC added 100 bucks to the cost of the og PS3. Sony struggle to sell those fat units.


I am referring to how Microsoft handled it. In this case, you are not paying extra and you are getting a very nice feature. I picked up my Xbox One S on sale online for $190, with no tax and free shipping.


You didn't limit your claim to Xbox and the topic was already dragging Playstation into it. 

The point is BC can be implemented badly
It's geeks who really make or break a TV show or movie or videogame.
VanderZoo 3 days ago#14
Babbit55 posted...
So at this point maybe not, though as time goes on and IF Sony do not pick up BC as well then Microsoft will be able to pitch an upgraded console with a huge library of games you already own. If you are moving to the next gen of consoles and you have 2 choices what would you pick?

Console with all your current games and accessories playable, and all the latest games too 

or

Console with a handful of release games and nothing else.


It's not a factor. Look how many people switched to 360 from PS2.

100 million people bought a Wii, hardly anyone bought a Wii U (and it was 100% BC with all Wii games and accessories).

Switch has no BC with anything and it's selling well. And of course PS4 has no BC, and it's selling really well.

BC is a great feature, but ultimately people buy new consoles for new games.
https://www.gog.com/
- 100% DRM free gaming
Babbit55 3 days ago#15
VanderZoo posted...
It's not a factor. Look how many people switched to 360 from PS2.

100 million people bought a Wii, hardly anyone bought a Wii U (and it was 100% BC with all Wii games and accessories).

Switch has no BC with anything and it's selling well. And of course PS4 has no BC, and it's selling really well.

BC is a great feature, but ultimately people buy new consoles for new games.


With PS3/360 Price played a MASSIVE part in the 360's success

The Wii U name was a mistake as the most people who picked up Wii's didn't even know it was an upgrade since a hell of a lot of Wii buyers got it for Wii fit and Wii sport.

Switch is pretty unique to be fair, that uniqueness is what sells it, though how many people got it as there primary gaming console? Or as a secondary for exclusives/portability?

Both the PS4 and Xbox one didn't have BC on release so we cannot be sure the affect it may of had, that and the xbox release was abysmally handled, almost made the Dreamcast release look good.

Like I said in a different post. BC is not the headline, though as gens move on, it will become a much bigger aspect of peoples purchasing choice.
VanderZoo 3 days ago#16
Babbit55 posted...

Like I said in a different post. BC is not the headline, though as gens move on, it will become a much bigger aspect of peoples purchasing choice.


I agree with that because of digital distribution mainly. I think PS5 will be BC with PS4 anyway, there's some practical reasons why they couldn't make PS4 BC with PS3.

But before that, Sony was the best with backwards compatibility, they did it before anyone else.
https://www.gog.com/
- 100% DRM free gaming
Babbit55 3 days ago#17
VanderZoo posted...
Babbit55 posted...

Like I said in a different post. BC is not the headline, though as gens move on, it will become a much bigger aspect of peoples purchasing choice.


I agree with that because of digital distribution mainly. I think PS5 will be BC with PS4 anyway, there's some practical reasons why they couldn't make PS4 BC with PS3.

But before that, Sony was the best with backwards compatibility, they did it before anyone else.


Yeah, not making the PS5 Backwards compatible would be a huge mistake. Surely Sony learned from the mistakes of the PS3 pricing and the Xbox one release, that you do not take your customers for granted a the majority can be pretty fickle.
Like I said in a different post. BC is not the headline, though as gens move on, it will become a much bigger aspect of peoples purchasing choice.


8 gens in and it's barely been a full feature on 2 consoles and a few handhelds. 

It remains one of those things some loud individuals overstate the importance of. Think about how absurd it sounds, as we get newer platforms most people will want to play their old games on their new systems. 

There is a market for it. I love playing classics time to time but it's marginal, at best, when looking at the time people spend with current games.
It's geeks who really make or break a TV show or movie or videogame.
Babbit55 3 days ago#19
ArsenicSteel posted...
Think about how absurd it sounds, as we get newer platforms most people will want to play their old games on their new systems.


Ask someone who mainly plays on PC how absurd it is that they shouldn't be able to play older games on newer hardware just because it is new.

Given the choice, I would rather have BC available and be able to play the games I enjoy on a single bit of hardware, than have to keep old kit just to play the odd older game I want to play.
Babbit55 posted...
ArsenicSteel posted...
Think about how absurd it sounds, as we get newer platforms most people will want to play their old games on their new systems.


Ask someone who mainly plays on PC how absurd it is that they shouldn't be able to play older games on newer hardware just because it is new.

Given the choice, I would rather have BC available and be able to play the games I enjoy on a single bit of hardware, than have to keep old kit just to play the odd older game I want to play.


Taking away an innate capability of the PC platform isn't the topic. 

BC for the console market has never been important. It's been nice when it has happened but doesn't push the industry.
It's geeks who really make or break a TV show or movie or videogame.
Bumbleoni 3 days ago#21
VanderZoo posted...
Sony was the best with backwards compatibility, they did it before anyone else.


I believe you could play Atari 2600 games on the Atari 5200, I think that might have been the first console to be "backwards compatible" but I'm not 100% sure
Babbit55 3 days ago#22
ArsenicSteel posted...
Babbit55 posted...
ArsenicSteel posted...
Think about how absurd it sounds, as we get newer platforms most people will want to play their old games on their new systems.


Ask someone who mainly plays on PC how absurd it is that they shouldn't be able to play older games on newer hardware just because it is new.

Given the choice, I would rather have BC available and be able to play the games I enjoy on a single bit of hardware, than have to keep old kit just to play the odd older game I want to play.


Taking away an innate capability of the PC platform isn't the topic. 

BC for the console market has never been important. It's been nice when it has happened but doesn't push the industry.


Well as has been shown, current consoles can play older games though hardware emulation, since this only now requires software and not a whole PS1/PS2 within the console (How the PS2 and 3 did it) they are very different beasts. 

Or would you, as a gamer and consumer rather not have the choice at all?
GinsuVictim 3 days ago#23
Bumbleoni posted...
VanderZoo posted...
Sony was the best with backwards compatibility, they did it before anyone else.


I believe you could play Atari 2600 games on the Atari 5200, I think that might have been the first console to be "backwards compatible" but I'm not 100% sure

The 5200 required an adapter that came too late into its life cycle and only worked on 2-port models. Before Sony was even making consoles, we had backwards compatibility on:
7800 played 2600.
Sega Genesis had an add-on to play Master System games.
SNES had the Super GameBoy add-on.

Sure, the last two required an add-on, but 7800 was right out of the box.
I'M RUNNIN' THIS MONKEY FARM NOW, FRANKENSTEIN!!! - Capt. Rhodes, Day of the Dead (1985)
(edited 3 days ago)quote
Babbit55 posted...
ArsenicSteel posted...
Babbit55 posted...
ArsenicSteel posted...
Think about how absurd it sounds, as we get newer platforms most people will want to play their old games on their new systems.


Ask someone who mainly plays on PC how absurd it is that they shouldn't be able to play older games on newer hardware just because it is new.

Given the choice, I would rather have BC available and be able to play the games I enjoy on a single bit of hardware, than have to keep old kit just to play the odd older game I want to play.


Taking away an innate capability of the PC platform isn't the topic. 

BC for the console market has never been important. It's been nice when it has happened but doesn't push the industry.


Well as has been shown, current consoles can play older games though hardware emulation, since this only now requires software and not a whole PS1/PS2 within the console (How the PS2 and 3 did it) they are very different beasts. 

Or would you, as a gamer and consumer rather not have the choice at all?


Wrong topic.
It's geeks who really make or break a TV show or movie or videogame.
WeskerTeam 3 days ago#25
I was always going to get it but I waited until they announced bc before I bought One.
Xbox GT - Kieduss
PSN ID - IDavey420
Babbit55 posted...
Or would you, as a gamer and consumer rather not have the choice at all?

Doubt he'll answer that.
Runeweaver 3 days ago#27
Its hard to say if it had an noticeable effect without sales figures, Personally I think it would have had a short term effect, enough to push a few people who were close to buying the xbox but needed an extra push, but after that I doubt it had an further effect,
I don't really know or care why anyone else buys what they buy. That's their business. All I care about is why I bought it. That's really all that matters.

This board has an unhealthy obsession with what other people buy and why they buy it and then attempts to use it as ammo in this fanboy console war.
Gamertag: Dirk McGurkin
JcOpIVY86 3 days ago#29
Definitely a factor for me. 
Last time I owned an Xbox was the 360 until it died on me. 
The Game Pass would not be worth it without the 360 games on it. 
Really looking forward to Orignal Xbox games on there. 
Crossing my fingers for Jade Empire and KOTOR. 
Oh and PGR damn it.
Sometimes it's what you don't do that makes you who you are.
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y115/jckorn86/smallerbanner.jpg
Bumbleoni 3 days ago#30
GinsuVictim posted...
Bumbleoni posted...
VanderZoo posted...
Sony was the best with backwards compatibility, they did it before anyone else.


I believe you could play Atari 2600 games on the Atari 5200, I think that might have been the first console to be "backwards compatible" but I'm not 100% sure

The 5200 required an adapter that came too late into its life cycle and only worked on 2-port models. Before Sony was even making consoles, we had backwards compatibility on:
7800 played 2600.
Sega Genesis had an add-on to play Master System games.
SNES had the Super GameBoy add-on.

Sure, the last two required an add-on, but 7800 was right out of the box.


When I was a kid we had a 2600 then from there I went to a NES, I knew about the BC on 5200 but I didn't know about the 7800 being BC right out of the box, that's pretty cool
GinsuVictim 3 days ago#31
Bumbleoni posted...
GinsuVictim posted...
Bumbleoni posted...
VanderZoo posted...
Sony was the best with backwards compatibility, they did it before anyone else.


I believe you could play Atari 2600 games on the Atari 5200, I think that might have been the first console to be "backwards compatible" but I'm not 100% sure

The 5200 required an adapter that came too late into its life cycle and only worked on 2-port models. Before Sony was even making consoles, we had backwards compatibility on:
7800 played 2600.
Sega Genesis had an add-on to play Master System games.
SNES had the Super GameBoy add-on.

Sure, the last two required an add-on, but 7800 was right out of the box.


When I was a kid we had a 2600 then from there I went to a NES, I knew about the BC on 5200 but I didn't know about the 7800 being BC right out of the box, that's pretty cool

I played more 2600 on my 7800 than anything. Of course, I only had like four 7800 carts. They were not common.
I'M RUNNIN' THIS MONKEY FARM NOW, FRANKENSTEIN!!! - Capt. Rhodes, Day of the Dead (1985)
TauriLeader 3 days ago#32
If it did sell more consoles it's not being used all that much. Last I read since it launched it made up 500 million gaming hours out of 18 billion gaming hours
Due to recent economic conditions, and the rising cost of Electricity, Gas and Oil, the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
Of course it helped. Some people here may be too young to remember last gen but BC was a huge feature then just as it is now. A lot of people enjoy it.
http://minus.com/lbfiUvu5vxhhzA
Forza defined the Car Simulator Genre, it was always the highest selling franchise in the genre by a HUGE margin. - Izraeil
Billo 2 days ago#34
Babbit55 posted...
ArsenicSteel posted...
Think about how absurd it sounds, as we get newer platforms most people will want to play their old games on their new systems.


Ask someone who mainly plays on PC how absurd it is that they shouldn't be able to play older games on newer hardware just because it is new.

Given the choice, I would rather have BC available and be able to play the games I enjoy on a single bit of hardware, than have to keep old kit just to play the odd older game I want to play.

The topic isn't about whether we would like to have BC or not, that's an obvious yes. The question is whether it's a feature that affects whether I'm going to buy a console because of it or not buy one if its lacking the feature and for that it's a no.
Absolutely
It sold me my two Xbox One consoles.
Poet Eliot had it all wrong....
I think it was the push a lot needed to transition from 360 to One.
Ten million dollars on a losing campaign
Twenty million starving and writhing in pain
MabusIncarnate posted...
I think it was the push a lot needed to transition from 360 to One.


This even though I have a fleet of Xbox 360s, it is still comforting to know that I will be able to buy a system in 2020 that plays Xbox 360 games.
Poet Eliot had it all wrong....
seanskate 1 day ago#39
It prevented me from selling mine. I never really played after finishing all the halo and gears and was contemplating selling. BC sale got like 15 games i wanted for 100 bucks, fallout, rdr, dead space trilogy will always be classics to me.
PSN: ClickyButton XBL: ClickyButton
yes friend of mine got one to play red dead redemption the day it went backwards compatible
GT: FullM3tal UK - PSN: DarthGokuverine
Me fail english that's unpossible
VanderZoo 1 day ago#41
uubershikamarux posted...
yes friend of mine got one to play red dead redemption the day it went backwards compatible


I have zero idea as to why rockstar didn't do a remaster of that game, it would have printed money.
https://www.gog.com/
- 100% DRM free gaming
TheGam3925 1 day ago#42
BC on the Xbone is pretty horrible anyway. If I don't have access to %99.99 of my 360 games on the Xbone then there's no point in it.

If I have to hook up my 360 to play Deadly Premonition, or my original Xbox to play Otogi, then I might as well just do that and have access to all of my games instead of this half assed s*** on the Xbone.

That's why the original PS3 model did it the best. I can still play my PS1, PS2 and PS3 games on it.
"The first company to reach 10 million in console sales wins" - Don Mattrick
snikt6384 1 day ago#43
It's absolutely selling consoles. How many, I don't know. But I think Xbone struggles from a lack of identity, as well as the bad will that has continued on (unfairly IMO) since that initial E3. As someone who got a PS4 first, there's almost no reason to own the system... but I do find BC enticing enough to snag one on the cheap.
TheGam3925 posted...
BC on the Xbone is pretty horrible anyway. If I don't have access to %99.99 of my 360 games on the Xbone then there's no point in it.

If I have to hook up my 360 to play Deadly Premonition, or my original Xbox to play Otogi, then I might as well just do that and have access to all of my games instead of this half assed s*** on the Xbone.

That's why the original PS3 model did it the best. I can still play my PS1, PS2 and PS3 games on it.

Miserable PSNow subscriber s***post.
Xbox One & PS4 Pro: RonBurgundy929
It's one of the reasons I finally picked one up... so I guess it does help sell consoles!
I'm a doctor too.
Apalachicola 9 hours ago#46
It was not a factor for me. It's a pleasant feature I suppose, but one I think I've used only twice. I've played more PS3 games on PS4.
Auto correct makes me look like a d***** fool. I'm not really this stupid.
amerk 4 hours ago#47
It's a nice feature, but if I were to base purchases on that alone I'd have missed out on other great consoles.

So, it's not necessarily a selling point, but is a nice feature, and in the end I'm not going to gripe if a feature I may or may not use is added.
urmie 3 hours ago#48
This generation it's definitely an exclusive to Xbox, which is a great free addition.

Imagine paying for it and having to wait? Well you got PSNow, which is a failure and should probably be called PS Later, lol.

https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/6onr3t/playstation_now_is_a_joke_pay_for_a_subscription/

9LzOHnu
Those who say it cannot be done, should not interrupt the one doing it.
GinsuVictim 3 hours ago#49
urmie posted...
This generation it's definitely an exclusive to Xbox, which is a great free addition.

Imagine paying for it and having to wait? Well you got PSNow, which is a failure and should probably be called PS Later, lol.

https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/6onr3t/playstation_now_is_a_joke_pay_for_a_subscription/

9LzOHnu

Holy crap, I had no idea about this! WOW!
I'M RUNNIN' THIS MONKEY FARM NOW, FRANKENSTEIN!!! - Capt. Rhodes, Day of the Dead (1985)
But....LOL @ Xbox BC....right?
Xbox One & PS4 Pro: RonBurgundy929
  1. Boards
  2. Xbox One 
  3. Has backwards compatibility helped sell Xbox One consoles?