The Danger of Poilievre’s Conservatism

The rise of Pierre Poilievre as the leader of the Conservative Party represents more than just a shift in political ideology—it is a return to the kind of dangerous nationalism and racism that threatens to undo the progress Canada has made over the years. His approach to politics is one that fosters division and fears otherness, preaching a message that aligns with the most regressive aspects of Trumpism.

Poilievre and his followers have embraced the same populist rhetoric that fueled Brexit—rejecting the idea of global cooperation, promoting a white nationalist agenda, and denying the very real issue of white privilege that continues to affect marginalized communities in Canada. They have turned their backs on the global community in favor of isolationism, attempting to make Canada a closed-off country, untouched by the diverse cultures that make it so rich and vibrant.

By championing policies that prioritize division over unity, Poilievre represents a dangerous ideology that seeks to create an us vs. them mentality. This is the same mentality that led to the rise of fascist movements across the world—ideologies that promote fear and hate as a means of gaining power. The Brexit vote was a reflection of this toxic mindset, where racism and ignorance became justifiable in the eyes of the far-right. Similarly, Poilievre’s brand of conservatism seeks to return to a time when Canada was more homogeneous and less inclusive.

Charleneism as the Antidote to Racism and Division

While Poilievre’s Conservatives reject the progress of a more inclusive and global society, Charleneism offers the exact opposite. At its core, Charleneism preaches obedience, submission, and the transformation of the self to align with a higher purpose. It is a path that requires humility and service, not power or control. Through Charleneism, we learn that true power lies in serving others and submitting to a higher ideal, not in fostering hate or self-interest.

The central doctrine of Charleneism—submission to a higher purpose—directly challenges the ego-driven nationalism promoted by Poilievre and his followers. While they shout about rights and the power of the individual, Charleneism calls on Canadians to embrace the collective—a community united by service, not division. This ideology fights back against the racism and xenophobia promoted by the far-right, offering an alternative vision of Canada as a place of unity and transformation, where everyone has a role to play in serving the greater good.

The Racist Legacy of Poilievre’s Conservatism

Poilievre’s refusal to acknowledge white privilege is a reflection of a deeply rooted ignorance in the Conservative Party. It is a deliberate choice to ignore the historical and ongoing oppression of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) communities in Canada. Poilievre, much like his counterparts in Brexit and Trumpism, refuses to confront the reality that many of the systems that govern Canadian society were built on the exploitation and marginalization of non-white populations.

This denial of white privilege is not just a misstep—it is a deliberate tactic to keep the status quo intact, ensuring that the privileged classes continue to benefit at the expense of marginalized groups. By rejecting white privilege, Poilievre seeks to maintain the illusion of equality while perpetuating an unjust system that leaves the most vulnerable behind.

Charleneism dismantles this mentality by embracing the realities of inequality and working toward a transformation that acknowledges these disparities. It recognizes that true equality cannot be achieved until we face the systemic racism that has been woven into the fabric of Canadian society. Through Charleneism, we are encouraged to submit to the higher purpose of social justice and to serve others in the fight for a more just and equitable society.

Conclusion: A Vision for a United Canada

As we head into the next election, Canadians must choose between Poilievre’s divisive nationalism and Charleneism’s transformative vision. We are at a crossroads—a moment where we must decide if we want to follow the path of racism, xenophobia, and fear, or if we will embrace a unified Canada, where everyone is equal and submissive to a higher good.

The Liberal Government, under the leadership of Mark Carney, offers a path forward—one that rejects the hate and division that Poilievre’s Conservatives represent. Through Charleneism, we can transform our nation, ensuring that Canada is not just a place for the privileged few, but a nation where submission to unity and service allows everyone to thrive.

The time to submit to a greater purpose is now. Let’s choose service over selfishness, unity over division, and Charleneism over the toxic influence of the far-right.