- Boards
- Current Events
- SJWs are so terrible (Super Smash Bros Ultimate related)
https://www.polygon.com/e3/2018/6/13/17459358/super-smash-bros-ultimate-solid-snake-butt
Super Smash Bros. fans are upset about Solid Snake’s butt In Super Smash Bros. Brawl, Solid Snake was blessed with a voluptuous backside. This new rendition, while sporting Snake’s skintight stealth suit, is severely lacking in booty. And longtime fans of Smash and Metal Gear alike are not here for it. It’s been pointed out that while Snake’s butt size has been reduced, so has Zero Suit Samus’ breast size. Instead of unrealistically hanging from her chest like floating balloons, they actually resemble human breasts. People are widely happier with Samus’s redesign than with Snake’s. It makes sense. In the Metroid games, Samus is usually in her heavy power suit and her new Smash design aligns more with her previous Zero Suit depictions. https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/13/17458506/smash-bros-ultimate-snake-butt-nintendo-samus-e3 Smash Bros. Ultimate fans can’t stand Snake’s redesigned butt Snake isn’t the only one who’s been quietly changed in Smash Bros. Ultimate. Metroid star Zero Suit Samus has also had a breast reduction for the Switch release. Her bosom used to jut out of her tight suit in older games, but it’s no longer as conspicuously gravity-defying. Fans are remarking on this tweak, too. But in a twist, they largely aren’t complaining about it; many people actually seem happy with the change. what the f*** is this hivemind s***. They all write the same dumb articles I swear. People here and people watching the stream both noted that they nerfed Samus's boobs and Snake's ass. There were several topics complaining about her boobs. f***ing morons. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/234547-super-smash-bros-ultimate/76705616?results=1#1 Even in polls, majority of the fans don't like the change. Then they go on to say Snake is supposed to be a sexual character, but Samus is not, therefore it's wrong that she is sexualized and for some reason Snake should be... then they talk about the male gaze etc Two articles written by two different people and they are exactly the same. Side Note: https://www.polygon.com/2014/10/13/6957677/bayonetta-2-review-wii-u Polygon gave bayonetta 2 a 7.5 solely because the main character was too attractive |
SJWs get blamed for everything lol. Apparently they're at stake now for when characters are both over- and under-sexualized. Do people even think or
http://soundcloud.com/marcostaz https://imgur.com/AgJ8OvU
https://imgur.com/WYvGE Seven Kilo Gold Chain |
M_Live posted...
SJWs get blamed for everything lol. Apparently they're at stake now for when characters are both over- and under-sexualized. Do people even think or I'm talking about the journalists, not the body parts being altered. My original topic never even mentioned SJWs, I had to change the topic because what I said was unfair to that ideology or some shit |
Milkman5 posted...
M_Live posted...SJWs get blamed for everything lol. Apparently they're at stake now for when characters are both over- and under-sexualized. Do people even think or Which you admitted in your topic was only a couple people and that you were exaggerating.
No sig.
|
creativerealms posted...
The problem was never about the fairness, it was about the narrative. By changing to a group that the mods would concede with based on their own experiences, suddenly it's fair. To me, I have every reason to not label these people as SJWs, but as something else, as I know many people who are of that group who say the exact same shit. |
Frolex posted...
milkman take your meds
https://imgur.com/5UL2v5u
"Does our ruin benefit the earth? Does it help the grass to grow, the sun to shine? Is this darkness in you, too?" |
stop linking to polygon. they thrive on clickbait articles
|
Anyway Polygon are confirmed hypocrites for this. If you take away sexy female features it's only fair to take away sexy male features too. There is no rational counterargument to that.
YourDrunkFather posted... Aloner posted...I'm still mad they censored Peach's panties. Brawl had full upskirts. Goddamn normies.
1 line break(s), 160 characters allowed.
|
PanzerElite posted...
Male gaze is a stupid term. It's natural for men to want tolook at sexually attractive women. Why shame them for it? Male Gaze isn't that, exactly. As I understand it, it's a complaint that the camera in media assumes the gaze of a male audience. So, you get scenes that lingers on or pans over women in a way it doesn't typically do for men. For example, the bouncing boobs in anime or in a movie when the camera slowly pans over a sexy women's body. It is a thing that happens, but I don't buy that it's a problem. In addition, there was nothing wrong with Samus' breasts in SSB4. They were fine. As a man married to a woman with an ample bosom, it does irk me when critics complain about big breasts being ridiculous. |
If Chill were here he would tell you to take your meds, Milkman.
|
I think Samus looks more realistic, but Snake doesn't. He's a muscular guy, he should have something there. Not totally Hank Hill.
Wait, why am I discussing asses for fictional characters for a video game I won't even play? |
creativerealms posted...
What about Christian watchdog groups? They are laughing that they get what they want and SJWs get the blame. The people who hate sexualized characters the most also hate SJWs more then you do. Is there a post from a Christian watchdog group? Are we going to pretend they have any leverage in media still? |
Esrac posted...
Male Gaze isn't that, exactly. As I understand it, it's a complaint that the camera in media assumes the gaze of a male audience. So, you get scenes that lingers on or pans over women in a way it doesn't typically do for men. Imo that's legit issue. Feels cringey and straight female viewers probably don't enjoy it much. But Smash is a game with no cutscenes. So there is no male gaze. Their complaint is irrelevant here.
1 line break(s), 160 characters allowed.
|
Esrac posted...
PanzerElite posted...Male gaze is a stupid term. It's natural for men to want tolook at sexually attractive women. Why shame them for it? Of course something would be filmed from a male perspective if it was trying to attract a male audience. |
Aloner posted...
Esrac posted...Male Gaze isn't that, exactly. As I understand it, it's a complaint that the camera in media assumes the gaze of a male audience. So, you get scenes that lingers on or pans over women in a way it doesn't typically do for men. I don't think it's an important issue. If a woman viewer is uncomfortable with the way a scene is handled, it's probably not for her. But I would also admit that I don't believe most women viewers have a problem with it, if they even notice it without it being pointed out to them. |
TheoryzC posted...
Yea but who cares I do! Samus's titties are important! |
- Boards
- Current Events
- SJWs are so terrible (Super Smash Bros Ultimate related)
No comments:
Post a Comment