Search

Saturday, August 12, 2017

Does Skies of Arcadia hold up today?

  1. Boards
  2. Dreamcast
  3. Does Skies of Arcadia hold up today?
TigerStealth 6 months ago#1
Is it still fun and enjoyable or are aspects of it too antiquated today-- example: are there really long gaps between save points, too many random encounters, story is good or corny? 

Like many of you I'm older and have less time for gaming so I have to carefully pick what I devote time too and and want to make sure it's worth the investment. I prefer games in the 25-40 hour range but will definitely go way higher if it's truly awesome.
Mario Maker level - The Great (Swim) Escape - 82D5-0000-008D-F254
looked 6 months ago#2
The random battle can be annoying, they sometime feel too frequent, and the battles usually aren't quick, but so what a games doesn't have to be perfect to be great. Skies is great, is there isn't much else like it.
este914 6 months ago#3
Ask here,
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/197237-skies-of-arcadia
The board is active
This Space For Rent.
SonRuck 6 months ago#4
Absolutely. Still needs a sequel
TheRushDawg 6 months ago#5
The story, sound track, world design and even the graphics hold up marvellously.

The random battles drag the game down though and may be a deal breaker for some. If you don't mind a high encounter rate, Skies is a delightful adventure.
PSN: RushDawg
NNID: TheRushDawg
samxx1x 6 months ago#6
Shouldn't seem any different. It's a random battle turn based RPG. The gameplay was out of date when those kind of games were invented.
egged on by a pack of halfwits
wingsofsatan 6 months ago#7
Yep. Beat it last year and I can easily say it's the best game I beat last year. I will say the random encounter rate is annoying sometimes.
You know what ol' Jack Burton always says at a time like this?
TigerStealth 6 months ago#8
Thanks I'll lean towards giving this a go. Biggest thing holding me back is long battles that I can't stop and save or long gaps between save points. Sometimes I'm gaming but need to stop unexpectedly, or other times I only have 30 mins to play. I love my 3ds and Vita cause of sleep mode
Mario Maker level - The Great (Swim) Escape - 82D5-0000-008D-F254
TheRushDawg 6 months ago#9
samxx1x posted...
Shouldn't seem any different. It's a random battle turn based RPG. The gameplay was out of date when those kind of games were invented.


Yes, but it was far less out of date in 2000 than it is in 2017. In 2000, there were still a fair number of turn based JRPGs being developed with random battles, plus a whole bunch that had been released recently on the PS1.

In 2017, turn-based JRPGs with random battles are a lot less common than they used to be.
PSN: RushDawg
NNID: TheRushDawg
samxx1x 6 months ago#10
Fair enough I will defer to you knowledge. I did play skies but as you could probably tell I'm not a massive fan of the genre!
egged on by a pack of halfwits
bultje112 6 months ago#11
http://www.gamefaqs.com/dreamcast/197237-skies-of-arcadia-dc/reviews/163129

I wrote a review about it. I actually like the game even more today than 15 years ago. the game has aged remarkably eventhough I dislike turnbased battles they didn't bother me in skies
MichaelS91 6 months ago#12
Yeah its great, try and play Grandia 2 aswell if you haven't also.
NNID: stretfordender91
PSN: m-smith1991
este 6 months ago#13
@bultje112 can you check my question in the topic on the SOA board? :)
--> The One .. ! este ! .. The Only <--
Knowledge Speaks. Wisdom Listens.
CloneTheHero 6 months ago#14
MichaelS91 posted...
Yeah its great, try and play Grandia 2 aswell if you haven't also.

i second grandia 2. my fav rpg on the dreamcast. 

i went back and replayed skies a few years back, game felt terribly dated in the graphics department even then, so imagine how hysterical it'd look in 2017. just felt like id mention that, because lets not kid anyone, as gamers were all graphics wh***s whether we want to admit it or not... BUT, i really gotta give credit in the fighting mechanics, where this game shines it holds up even til today. def worth a play.
Currently Playing: Elite Dangerous, Pillars of Eternity
bultje112 6 months ago#15
the graphics of skies still look amazing imo. especially on vga
bultje112 6 months ago#16
este posted...
@bultje112 can you check my question in the topic on the SOA board? :)

I did :)
Katon 6 months ago#17
Skies of Arcadia definitely holds up. Fantastic game!
"You can almost taste how much the Bubsy 3D makers hated the children of America," from Seanbaby's review of Bubsy 3D (EGM #150)
CyberHaunky 6 months ago#18
I replayed it last December myself and it's easily better than 90% of the RPGs that are released today. Absolutely loved every minute of it.
PedroMontana 6 months ago#19
The graphics didn't age as well as Grandia 2's because they went for a more detailed/realistic style for SoA, but i think it still looks ok.

The high rate of random encounters was always a controversial aspect of SoA, i don't think it has much to do with age. Either you like that aspect of SoA, or you can live with it, or it'll make you dislike the game.
I hope Grasshopper's new PS4 game LET IT DIE will also come to the Nintendo Switch!
Snake_Oil 6 months ago#20
SonRuck posted...
Absolutely. Still needs a sequel

And a prequel too! <: D
GET SOME REST!!!
dr_zomberg 6 months ago#21
on gamecube? absolutely. 
on dc? not really.
Professional 3d erotica maker, proud videogame collector, extremely functional sociopath. Also a girl
full sig is too short to list all game systems i own.
bultje112 5 months ago#22
dr_zomberg posted...
on gamecube? absolutely. 
on dc? not really.

haha. troll....
dr_zomberg 5 months ago#23
not troling.
i play my gamecbe version more than the dc version.
more quests, more things to do...

the lower quality music is not a real detriment to me if it means not having to fight every 13 seconds.
Professional 3d erotica maker, proud videogame collector, extremely functional sociopath. Also a girl
full sig is too short to list all game systems i own.
Snake_Oil 5 months ago#24
No hard feelings! ; )
GET SOME REST!!!
bultje112 5 months ago#25
dr_zomberg posted...
not troling.
i play my gamecbe version more than the dc version.
more quests, more things to do...

the lower quality music is not a real detriment to me if it means not having to fight every 13 seconds.

the sound was seriously degraded imo. also the random battles are just the same in the gamecube for me. not any less at all. also I prefer to play it on dreamcast through vga graphically and I must say I love how the vmu works with searching chams in the game. in every way you feel the game was made with only dreamcast in mind and the sidequests aren't that big of a deal to me. the game is very long as it is.
TheRushDawg 5 months ago#26
The encounter rate reduction on the GC is barely noticeable. You still get into a random battle all the damn time.

I do prefer the additional content, but also miss the music.

Hopefully they make a Skies of Arcadia HD, with all of the GC's extra content, plus an even lower encounter rate. As it stands, there's no definitive version of the game.
PSN: RushDawg
NNID: TheRushDawg
bultje112 5 months ago#27
exactly. if the random battle encounter in the gamecube is 1% lower than the dreamcast then it's a lot. never noticed it
dr_zomberg 5 months ago#28
well i noticed a far wider margin than 1%. plus more experience earned per battle, requiring less grinding.

also, piastol. 

piastol> the dreamcast version.

i was this close to cosplaying as her one time.
Professional 3d erotica maker, proud videogame collector, extremely functional sociopath. Also a girl
full sig is too short to list all game systems i own.
Vegeta1000 5 months ago#29
Video games don't age. Skies of Arcadia is as good as it was in 2000.
Nas won
TheRushDawg 5 months ago#30
Vegeta1000 posted...
Video games don't age. Skies of Arcadia is as good as it was in 2000.


Video games don't age, but standards improve. What was considered acceptable in 2000 (lots of random encounters, no voice acting) is considered very primitive by today. Yes, it is the same game, but we are not the same as gamers. That is why it is perfectly reasonable for a person to like a game upon release and dislike the same game after revisiting it 15 years later. The game didn't change; the player did. It is also why someone who didn't play the game back in 2000 may not like the game at all today. They won't have any nostalgia for it and will be less patient with outdated design.
PSN: RushDawg
NNID: TheRushDawg
TheRushDawg 5 months ago#31
As an aside, the best game to feature Vyse and Aika as playable characters is Valkyria Chronicles.
PSN: RushDawg
NNID: TheRushDawg
Vegeta1000 5 months ago#32
TheRushDawg posted...
Vegeta1000 posted...
Video games don't age. Skies of Arcadia is as good as it was in 2000.


Video games don't age, but standards improve. What was considered acceptable in 2000 (lots of random encounters, no voice acting) is considered very primitive by today. Yes, it is the same game, but we are not the same as gamers. That is why it is perfectly reasonable for a person to like a game upon release and dislike the same game after revisiting it 15 years later. The game didn't change; the player did. It is also why someone who didn't play the game back in 2000 may not like the game at all today. They won't have any nostalgia for it and will be less patient with outdated design.


Newer gamers are spoiled brats.
Nas won
TheRushDawg 5 months ago#33
Vegeta1000 posted...
TheRushDawg posted...
Vegeta1000 posted...
Video games don't age. Skies of Arcadia is as good as it was in 2000.


Video games don't age, but standards improve. What was considered acceptable in 2000 (lots of random encounters, no voice acting) is considered very primitive by today. Yes, it is the same game, but we are not the same as gamers. That is why it is perfectly reasonable for a person to like a game upon release and dislike the same game after revisiting it 15 years later. The game didn't change; the player did. It is also why someone who didn't play the game back in 2000 may not like the game at all today. They won't have any nostalgia for it and will be less patient with outdated design.


Newer gamers are spoiled brats.


No just newer gamers. Many older gamers have a tough time going back to the games of their youth after having been spoiled by the improvements made by modern games.
PSN: RushDawg
NNID: TheRushDawg
TigerStealth 5 months ago#34
TheRushDawg posted...
Vegeta1000 posted...
TheRushDawg posted...
Vegeta1000 posted...
Video games don't age. Skies of Arcadia is as good as it was in 2000.


Video games don't age, but standards improve. What was considered acceptable in 2000 (lots of random encounters, no voice acting) is considered very primitive by today. Yes, it is the same game, but we are not the same as gamers. That is why it is perfectly reasonable for a person to like a game upon release and dislike the same game after revisiting it 15 years later. The game didn't change; the player did. It is also why someone who didn't play the game back in 2000 may not like the game at all today. They won't have any nostalgia for it and will be less patient with outdated design.


Newer gamers are spoiled brats.


No just newer gamers. Many older gamers have a tough time going back to the games of their youth after having been spoiled by the improvements made by modern games.


This is me. I'm an older gamer my first system was NES and sometimes old games delight me other times they frustrate me with outdated systems given my limited time to game now. My #1 gripe is long time between save points since sometimes I need to completely stop playing at a moments notice and can't return to the game at all that day
Mario Maker level - The Great (Swim) Escape - 82D5-0000-008D-F254
dr_zomberg 5 months ago#35
i dont have that problem.
i still own every game ive had since i was born. and i play them somewhat regularly so i dont feel nostalgia. the enjoyment i get from them today is the same i got when i was 4
Professional 3d erotica maker, proud videogame collector, extremely functional sociopath. Also a girl
full sig is too short to list all game systems i own.
Vegeta1000 5 months ago#36
TheRushDawg posted...

No just newer gamers. Many older gamers have a tough time going back to the games of their youth after having been spoiled by the improvements made by modern games.


Newer, more updated mechanics doesn't make newer games better by default. I agree that outdated mechanics can make older games harder to play today, but newer games are not without its faults. A common criticism with modern game developers is playing too safe (ex: Madden, Call of Duty, New Super Mario Bros.). Too many shooters play like Halo or Call of Duty rather than being its on thing. There were a lot of Doom clones back in the day, but they usually had something to make it stand out. Not the case with most games today. It's expected considering games today cost a lot more than it did back in the day, but still disappointing. Companies back in the day took more risk with their games and when it paid off it paid off big time.
Nas won
bultje112 5 months ago#37
in general games are a lot better today then back in the day. however it's more regular now. the best games were also made 15-25 years ago because more risks were taken and more creativity was needed with limited resources.
Ryphis_Demeanor 5 months ago#38
I loved it so much but near the end the random battles did start driving me crazy, though the Sky Ship battles more than make up for it! I think it was more the same song, (random battle music is always my downfall after the 700th time hearing that same song again).
Snake_Oil 5 months ago#39
When are we gonna get a sequal/prequal? <: P
GET SOME REST!!!
Shotgunnova 5 months ago#40
I think it holds up pretty well today, strictly on the awesome world, characters, soundtrack, ship battles and exploration. The oft-cited random battle frequency didn't bother me, but in some cases, it can seem high. Later on, you can mod the ship to fly above or below the clouds, preventing random battles altogether, so that helped some.
Take me down from the ridge where the summer ends
And watch the city spread out just like a jet's flame
MichaelS91 5 months ago#41
Snake_Oil posted...
When are we gonna get a sequal/prequal? <: P

Never seemingly. Besides sonic, sega rally and virtua tennis and one or 2 others (eg phantasy star) with portable games they pretty much abandoned sequels or prequels to a very large bulk of games post dreamcast. But I guess the positive is we get brand new series.
NNID: stretfordender91
PSN: m-smith1991
desassina 5 months ago#42
It doesn't hold up very well. What random encounters had over real time battle engagement was their scale. You could have a dedicated arena to showcase how big the monster was, because he didn't have to appear in its hub, but Skies of Arcadia isn't that monumental. Even the best Wii U RPG got this covered. Let's not even mention Vita's.
If you take ten to the chin by his own hand
Then you have just been... Tenshinhan'd
ThisIsPlayer2 5 months ago#43
It still looks great and has amazing character, but I'm not sure I could ever face playing any 45-hour JRPG again. 

If I did, Skies would be joint top of the list alongside FFVII.
  1. Boards
  2. Dreamcast 
  3. Does Skies of Arcadia hold up today?

No comments:

Post a Comment