Search

Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Will Switch lose Rockstar support if L.A. Noire doesn't sell well?

  1. Boards
  2. Nintendo Switch
  3. Will Switch lose Rockstar support if L.A. Noire doesn't sell well?
ponyseizures 4 days ago#1
Worried for this updated port
4124-4997-6171
slyman19 4 days ago#2
Why wouldn't it?
BosSBaer 4 days ago#3
Yes.
Libra
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#4
With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
slyman19 4 days ago#5
DiscostewSM posted...
With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?

It's pretty dumb to compare support for those consoles and Nintendo consoles.
AstralFrost 4 days ago#6
Yes, but then its unlikely the Switch will get any real 8th gen titles anyway, I mean this is just a 7th gen port.
Finally you will come to understand the extent of Nintendo's greed and Sony's love of gamers.
It's a great game if nintendo fans can't see that maybe they don't deserve other rockstar games
The legend meets its match but...the world is always changing..for the fifteenth coming.
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#8
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?

It's pretty dumb to compare support for those consoles and Nintendo consoles.

Well, it's pretty dumb to assume that Switch would lose support and PS4/XB1 would not if this game sold poorly on all. It just means that there's no audience for this type of game anywhere, and that a different game may be more fitting.
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
(edited 4 days ago)reportquote
slyman19 4 days ago#9
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?

It's pretty dumb to compare support for those consoles and Nintendo consoles.

Well, it's pretty dumb to assume that Switch would lose support and PS4/XB1 would not if this game sold poorly on all.

Not at all. Xbox/PS gamers have proven time and time again that they'll buy most games. Devs are satisfied with the response from Xbox/PS gamers. They know there is a market for their games on those platforms. 

Nintendo gamers on the other hand, have shown time and time again that they don't buy games outside of Nintendo and a select few third party devs. Devs can't trust Nintendo gamers like they can Xbox/PS gamers.
Siriocaz 4 days ago#10
I don't think it should depend on that, but who knows, maybe the company isn't willing to support the console altogether and they're releasing this game...for some weird reason. People need to comprehend that this will cost more expensive than on PS4/ONE, that it's a 6-year old game and not precisely one of Rockstar's flagpship titles. 

It's not as bad as what Capcom is doing, though, since they have explicitly said that they will determine the support they're going to give to the machine based on the performance of their over-priced ports of 1+ year old games. But I don't believe such a thing, it's dumb.
Thinking a signature.
it would depend on sales compared to other consoles too and compared to their target goal. if the game is just a flop everywhere then it wasn't really one system.
3DS FC: 2063-0061-2915
``if the system is easy to develop for then that just confirms how weak it is" shaunme - 2014
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#12
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?

It's pretty dumb to compare support for those consoles and Nintendo consoles.

Well, it's pretty dumb to assume that Switch would lose support and PS4/XB1 would not if this game sold poorly on all.

Not at all. Xbox/PS gamers have proven time and time again that they'll buy most games. Devs are satisfied with the response from Xbox/PS gamers. They know there is a market for their games on those platforms. 

Nintendo gamers on the other hand, have shown time and time again that they don't buy games outside of Nintendo and a select few third party devs. Devs can't trust Nintendo gamers like they can Xbox/PS gamers.

There is a market on PS/XB because they stuck with them through all manner of sales, from the good and the bad. where else could they have gone if no one liked their games on those platforms? If they are looking for trust, then they must be willing to provide that which trust can be gained. Trust is not simply given. Trust is earned. A single game, especially one so significantly different from the rest by the one developer, is not enough to prove if an audience would like their other games.
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
(edited 4 days ago)reportquote
L.A. Noir is definitely a strange choice to determine future consideration. Not that it's a bad game, but it's interesting that they didn't choose to port over GTA IV or V, or Red Dead Redemption - Popular Rockstar games that sold very well. 

Perhaps the size of the games is what determined what would get ported over? If that's the case, I'm not sure if L.A. Noir's success would make any difference in attracting bigger games. Maybe if those bigger games were digital-only? I'm trying to imagine how they would work that if it happened.
Ever since I started working, every day has been worse than the last, so every time you see me it's the worst day of my life. - Office Space
the_NGW 4 days ago#14
*third party releases game on Nintendo system*
Drones: Ugh, they're just releasing this so they can blame us and not support Nintendo when it flops*
GP Vs 2016: Second Place Winner
PSN: ourtheNGW, Now Playing: The Binding of Isaac: Afterbirth +
slyman19 4 days ago#15
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?

It's pretty dumb to compare support for those consoles and Nintendo consoles.

Well, it's pretty dumb to assume that Switch would lose support and PS4/XB1 would not if this game sold poorly on all.

Not at all. Xbox/PS gamers have proven time and time again that they'll buy most games. Devs are satisfied with the response from Xbox/PS gamers. They know there is a market for their games on those platforms. 

Nintendo gamers on the other hand, have shown time and time again that they don't buy games outside of Nintendo and a select few third party devs. Devs can't trust Nintendo gamers like they can Xbox/PS gamers.

There is a market on PS/XB because they stuck with them through all manner of sales, from the good and the bad. where else could they have gone if no one liked their games on those platforms? If they are looking for trust, then they must be willing to provide that which trust can be gained. Trust is not simply given. Trust is earned. A single game, especially one so significantly different from the rest by the one developer, is not enough to prove if an audience would like their other games.

Nintendo fans have failed each and every time Rockstar has ported a game. Hell, the Wii got the best version of Bully and Chinatown Wars was great, yet Nintendo fans turned their nose up. L.A. Noire isn't the first test, it's simply the latest for Nintendo fans.
the_NGW posted...
*third party releases game on Nintendo system*
Drones: Ugh, they're just releasing this so they can blame us and not support Nintendo when it flops*
Yes, it's a good possibility when it comes to Nintendo and third parties.
"Scranton is great, but New York is like Scranton on acid. No, on speed. Nah. On steroids."
FC: 3282-3258-0224
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#18
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?

It's pretty dumb to compare support for those consoles and Nintendo consoles.

Well, it's pretty dumb to assume that Switch would lose support and PS4/XB1 would not if this game sold poorly on all.

Not at all. Xbox/PS gamers have proven time and time again that they'll buy most games. Devs are satisfied with the response from Xbox/PS gamers. They know there is a market for their games on those platforms. 

Nintendo gamers on the other hand, have shown time and time again that they don't buy games outside of Nintendo and a select few third party devs. Devs can't trust Nintendo gamers like they can Xbox/PS gamers.

There is a market on PS/XB because they stuck with them through all manner of sales, from the good and the bad. where else could they have gone if no one liked their games on those platforms? If they are looking for trust, then they must be willing to provide that which trust can be gained. Trust is not simply given. Trust is earned. A single game, especially one so significantly different from the rest by the one developer, is not enough to prove if an audience would like their other games.

Nintendo fans have failed each and every time Rockstar has ported a game. Hell, the Wii got the best version of Bully and Chinatown Wars was great, yet Nintendo fans turned their nose up. L.A. Noire isn't the first test, it's simply the latest for Nintendo fans.

Bully sold 500K on Wii, whereas it sold 1.07m on the 360. PS3 never got it. Why didn't PS3 get it? Was it because they felt there would be no audience for it? 500K is still more than 0. If only those PS3 owners had the chance......
R* blamed piracy for Chinatown Wars' numbers, not lack of interest, even though it still sold more on DS than it did on PSP.

We should look into all possibilities and conditions, right? Not assume it's a specific scenario, like saying Nintendo fans turned their nose up?
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
(edited 4 days ago)reportquote
slyman19 4 days ago#19
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?

It's pretty dumb to compare support for those consoles and Nintendo consoles.

Well, it's pretty dumb to assume that Switch would lose support and PS4/XB1 would not if this game sold poorly on all.

Not at all. Xbox/PS gamers have proven time and time again that they'll buy most games. Devs are satisfied with the response from Xbox/PS gamers. They know there is a market for their games on those platforms. 

Nintendo gamers on the other hand, have shown time and time again that they don't buy games outside of Nintendo and a select few third party devs. Devs can't trust Nintendo gamers like they can Xbox/PS gamers.

There is a market on PS/XB because they stuck with them through all manner of sales, from the good and the bad. where else could they have gone if no one liked their games on those platforms? If they are looking for trust, then they must be willing to provide that which trust can be gained. Trust is not simply given. Trust is earned. A single game, especially one so significantly different from the rest by the one developer, is not enough to prove if an audience would like their other games.

Nintendo fans have failed each and every time Rockstar has ported a game. Hell, the Wii got the best version of Bully and Chinatown Wars was great, yet Nintendo fans turned their nose up. L.A. Noire isn't the first test, it's simply the latest for Nintendo fans.

Bully sold 500K on Wii, whereas it sold 1.07m on the 360. PS3 never got it. Why didn't PS3 get it? Was it because they felt there would be no audience for it? 500K is still more than 0. If only those PS3 owners had the chance......
R* blamed piracy for Chinatown Wars' numbers, not lack of interest, even though it still sold more on DS than it did on PSP.

We should look into all possibilities and conditions, right? Not assume it's a specific scenario, like saying Nintendo fans turned their nose up?

The PS3 didn't get it because the PS2 did. They probably thought not enough people would double dip. 

The PSP actually outsold the DS versions. 

When all other possibilities have been exhausted, what remains must be the truth. Nintendo fans do not buy Rockstar games.
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#20
slyman19 posted...
The PS3 didn't get it because the PS2 did. They probably thought not enough people would double dip. 

The PSP actually outsold the DS versions. 

When all other possibilities have been exhausted, what remains must be the truth. Nintendo fans do not buy Rockstar games.


Didn't stop the 360 version from selling more, and releasing 2 years after the PS2 version with far fewer hardware units sold. Still, it only sold 1.07 million copies on 360. Selling 500K on Wii isn't exactly "turning a nose up" on it by comparison.

And what's your source on the Chinatown Wars numbers? You can dismiss VGChartz all you want, but unless you got proof of your own from elsewhere, then you've got nothing but assumptions.

How easily you exhausted all other possibilities after you went berserk about "considering all possibilities" before like there was no end to them. This is just your excuse to get out of an argument with an unproven claim.
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
slyman19 4 days ago#21
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
The PS3 didn't get it because the PS2 did. They probably thought not enough people would double dip. 

The PSP actually outsold the DS versions. 

When all other possibilities have been exhausted, what remains must be the truth. Nintendo fans do not buy Rockstar games.


Didn't stop the 360 version from selling more, and releasing 2 years after the PS2 version with far fewer hardware units sold. Still, it only sold 1.07 million copies on 360. Selling 500K on Wii isn't exactly "turning a nose up" on it by comparison.

And what's your source on the Chinatown Wars numbers? You can dismiss VGChartz all you want, but unless you got proof of your own from elsewhere, then you've got nothing but assumptions.

How easily you exhausted all other possibilities after you went berserk about "considering all possibilities" before like there was no end to them. This is just your excuse to get out of an argument with an unproven claim.

Wait a f***ing second, you actually used Vgchartz? What the f*** is wrong with you?
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#22
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
The PS3 didn't get it because the PS2 did. They probably thought not enough people would double dip. 

The PSP actually outsold the DS versions. 

When all other possibilities have been exhausted, what remains must be the truth. Nintendo fans do not buy Rockstar games.


Didn't stop the 360 version from selling more, and releasing 2 years after the PS2 version with far fewer hardware units sold. Still, it only sold 1.07 million copies on 360. Selling 500K on Wii isn't exactly "turning a nose up" on it by comparison.

And what's your source on the Chinatown Wars numbers? You can dismiss VGChartz all you want, but unless you got proof of your own from elsewhere, then you've got nothing but assumptions.

How easily you exhausted all other possibilities after you went berserk about "considering all possibilities" before like there was no end to them. This is just your excuse to get out of an argument with an unproven claim.

Wait a f***ing second, you actually used Vgchartz? What the f*** is wrong with you?

And your numbers come from.........
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
DynoStretch 4 days ago#23
the_NGW posted...
*third party releases game on Nintendo system*
Drones: Ugh, they're just releasing this so they can blame us and not support Nintendo when it flops


Can you blame people with companies like Ubsisoft getting pissy when we didn't buy their rushed AC ports back on the U? 

Or when Capcom was happy to see how well Super Street Fighter did, and then go and tell us future support now depends on RE: Revelations sales?

Sometimes it feels like we're being blackmailed for support.
"Sony and MS both gave us good systems last generation so their greed is justified." ~ xF0x
Switch Friend Code - SW-7742-3930-7408
slyman19 4 days ago#24
DiscostewSM posted...
And your numbers come from.........

Nope. You lost this argument. I can't believe you would do something as stupid as to use Vgchartz in an argument. I bet you f***ing used Wikipedia on your college papers.
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#25
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
And your numbers come from.........

Nope. You lost this argument. I can't believe you would do something as stupid as to use Vgchartz in an argument. I bet you f***ing used Wikipedia on your college papers.

Like I said, "you can dismiss VGChartz all you want, but unless you got proof of your own from elsewhere, then you've got nothing but assumptions."
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
Let's be honest, most people aren't going to buy this game anyway. It's ages old and wasn't a heavy hitter when it released then. If It was GTA5, that may be a different story. Sure GTA5 is old as well, but it has legs and still sells to this day. LA does not. 

Hopefully Rockstar doesn't base it's support on a game that they know full and damn well wouldn't sell in the first place. In fact, the decision to bring this game to Switch in the first place baffles me, as they know everyone would rather just have GTA5 on the console. Guess we'll wait and see.
"Oh I saw the damage in you, my fortunate one, the envy of youth..."
(edited 4 days ago)reportquote
slyman19 4 days ago#27
DiscostewSM posted...
Like I said, "you can dismiss VGChartz all you want, but unless you got proof of your own from elsewhere, then you've got nothing but assumptions."

Vgchartz IS one big assumption. It can't be used in an argument because it's so damn unreliable.
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#28
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
Like I said, "you can dismiss VGChartz all you want, but unless you got proof of your own from elsewhere, then you've got nothing but assumptions."

Vgchartz IS one big assumption. It can't be used in an argument because it's so damn unreliable.

So then, prove you're correct on those numbers. It shouldn't be that hard if you were so willing to claim it as such. At least with VGChartz, they may not always be s***. Numbers from your ass are always s***ty.
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
Yes.

Next muhf***in question?
The world is better off with some people gone. Our lives are not all interconnected. That theory is a crock. Some people truly do not need to be here.
slyman19 4 days ago#30
DiscostewSM posted...
So then, prove you're correct on those numbers. It shouldn't be that hard if you were so willing to claim it as such. At least with VGChartz, they may not always be s***. Numbers from your ass are always s***ty.

No need. I already won this argument, shill. Maybe you'll get me next time.
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#31
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
So then, prove you're correct on those numbers. It shouldn't be that hard if you were so willing to claim it as such. At least with VGChartz, they may not always be s***. Numbers from your ass are always s***ty.

No need. I already won this argument, shill. Maybe you'll get me next time.

Nope, you didn't, but nice try.
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
slyman19 4 days ago#32
DiscostewSM posted...
Nope, you didn't, but nice try.

Hey, I'm not the one using a bulls*** source. Sorry if you f***ing suck at arguments. Take this as a learning experience, shill.
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#33
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
Nope, you didn't, but nice try.

Hey, I'm not the one using a bulls*** source. Sorry if you f***ing suck at arguments. Take this as a learning experience, shill.

Should have known I was dealing with a stubborn donkey.
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
Why support old ports? When you can buy both present full current gen games like NBA 2k18 and WWE 2k18. Both are part of Take Two Interactive which is basically the father of both Rockstar and 2k Games.
PC-Battlenet:JairusMonill#1876 Steam:jairusmonillas PSN:JairusMonillasR3
Excited for: NBA 2k18, Marvel Vs Capcom Infinite, Gran Turismo Sport
slyman19 4 days ago#35
Heh, we both got fool then. I actually believed your numbers came from a good source.
(edited 4 days ago)reportquote
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#36
slyman19 posted...
Heh, we both got fool then. I actually believed your numbers came from a good source.

Considering how old those games are, they're probably accurate. That's how VGChartz works. They get numbers they believe are correct, then adjust them when numbers are actually given. I don't trust VGChartz with new game numbers. No one does. But old numbers are generally ok. These are roughly from a decade ago, where digital wasn't widespread enough to tip the scale.
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
(edited 4 days ago)reportquote
MARSDUDE 4 days ago#37
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
Heh, we both got fool then. I actually believed your numbers came from a good source.

Considering how old those games are, they're probably accurate. That's how VGChartz works. They get numbers they believe are correct, then adjust them when numbers are actually given. I don't trust VGChartz with new game numbers. No one does. But old numbers are generally ok. These are roughly from a decade ago, where digital wasn't widespread enough to tip the scale.


Why bother? That's three threads tonight I've seen that guy pull the same s***.
"Cool" - mariobro8
DiscostewSM 4 days ago#38
MARSDUDE posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
Heh, we both got fool then. I actually believed your numbers came from a good source.

Considering how old those games are, they're probably accurate. That's how VGChartz works. They get numbers they believe are correct, then adjust them when numbers are actually given. I don't trust VGChartz with new game numbers. No one does. But old numbers are generally ok. These are roughly from a decade ago, where digital wasn't widespread enough to tip the scale.


Why bother? That's three threads tonight I've seen that guy pull the same s***.

Just trying to give him a chance.
"When you've got no argument, say something bad about <x>."
Perfectly explains why the Nintendo boards are toxic and are full of trolls/haters.
MrTuna 4 days ago#39
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?

It's pretty dumb to compare support for those consoles and Nintendo consoles.

Well, it's pretty dumb to assume that Switch would lose support and PS4/XB1 would not if this game sold poorly on all.

Not at all. Xbox/PS gamers have proven time and time again that they'll buy most games. Devs are satisfied with the response from Xbox/PS gamers. They know there is a market for their games on those platforms. 

Nintendo gamers on the other hand, have shown time and time again that they don't buy games outside of Nintendo and a select few third party devs. Devs can't trust Nintendo gamers like they can Xbox/PS gamers.


Well when the third party ports run worse and cost more whats the point?

I'll just keep buying all my third party games on PC
GT:OG Kush Man | i5 4690k | EVGA 980Ti | 16 gigs ram | 1TB HDD | 250 GB SSD |
(edited 4 days ago)reportquote
geneticsftw 4 days ago#40
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
Nope, you didn't, but nice try.

Hey, I'm not the one using a bulls*** source. Sorry if you f***ing suck at arguments. Take this as a learning experience, shill.

You don't even have a valid source.
donkeypunch1116 posted...
Let's be honest, most people aren't going to buy this game anyway. It's ages old and wasn't a heavy hitter when it released then. If It was GTA5, that may be a different story. Sure GTA5 is old as well, but it has legs and still sells to this day. LA does not. 

Hopefully Rockstar doesn't base it's support on a game that they know full and damn well wouldn't sell in the first place. In fact, the decision to bring this game to Switch in the first place baffles me, as they know everyone would rather just have GTA5 on the console. Guess we'll wait and see.


I think that L.A. Noire was chosen for the port, because it can actually fit on a Switch cartridge whereas GTA V could not. I think that the only way GTA V could work on the Switch is if it was digital-only. 

What is interesting is that Rockstar went with L.A. Noire instead of Red Dead Redemption, which could fit on a cart. Perhaps that could be the next game if L.A. Noire sells well.
Ever since I started working, every day has been worse than the last, so every time you see me it's the worst day of my life. - Office Space
ssjmole 4 days ago#42
SplatterHouse55 posted...
donkeypunch1116 posted...
Let's be honest, most people aren't going to buy this game anyway. It's ages old and wasn't a heavy hitter when it released then. If It was GTA5, that may be a different story. Sure GTA5 is old as well, but it has legs and still sells to this day. LA does not. 

Hopefully Rockstar doesn't base it's support on a game that they know full and damn well wouldn't sell in the first place. In fact, the decision to bring this game to Switch in the first place baffles me, as they know everyone would rather just have GTA5 on the console. Guess we'll wait and see.


I think that L.A. Noire was chosen for the port, because it can actually fit on a Switch cartridge whereas GTA V could not. I think that the only way GTA V could work on the Switch is if it was digital-only. 

What is interesting is that Rockstar went with L.A. Noire instead of Red Dead Redemption, which could fit on a cart. Perhaps that could be the next game if L.A. Noire sells well.



But GTA V fit on 360 disc. It can fit on switch
Signature, What's that?
ssjmole posted...
SplatterHouse55 posted...
donkeypunch1116 posted...
Let's be honest, most people aren't going to buy this game anyway. It's ages old and wasn't a heavy hitter when it released then. If It was GTA5, that may be a different story. Sure GTA5 is old as well, but it has legs and still sells to this day. LA does not. 

Hopefully Rockstar doesn't base it's support on a game that they know full and damn well wouldn't sell in the first place. In fact, the decision to bring this game to Switch in the first place baffles me, as they know everyone would rather just have GTA5 on the console. Guess we'll wait and see.


I think that L.A. Noire was chosen for the port, because it can actually fit on a Switch cartridge whereas GTA V could not. I think that the only way GTA V could work on the Switch is if it was digital-only. 

What is interesting is that Rockstar went with L.A. Noire instead of Red Dead Redemption, which could fit on a cart. Perhaps that could be the next game if L.A. Noire sells well.



But GTA V fit on 360 disc. It can fit on switch


Yeah, you're right. I mistakenly looked at how many GB it would take to upload the PS4 version (over 60 GB). The 360 digital version is 18 GB (without patches). It took two discs to run GTAV on the 360 - one of which had to be completely uploaded to the 360 - but the 2 discs together put the game at about 18 GB.

However, the online portion of the game might have since inflated the size of the initial 18 GB game (and its 2 GB patch). I actually don't know if the online portion has been a growing mound of GB patches and updates, but I do remember that the online portion of the game wasn't available on the 360 when it launched, and for quite a while afterwards. The online portion is a lot of game that I'm pretty certain had to be added to the initial 18 GB game, although I don't know how many GB it would have increased the total.

That being said, the Switch should be able to at least run the base game. Maybe the online portion of it is the sticking point, because it would make too much sense for GTAV to get released on the Switch. It's still a big seller, and I'm sure that GTAV on the go would be an attractive proposition for many.

I guess it would make sense to release the base game on cartridge, and make the online portion a digital install. Perhaps Nintendo's online service is a factor for a possible release in the future. Anyhow, I'd agree that L.A. Noire is a strange choice for a port.
Ever since I started working, every day has been worse than the last, so every time you see me it's the worst day of my life. - Office Space
(edited 4 days ago)reportquote
Megaman Omega 23 hours ago#44
DiscostewSM posted...
slyman19 posted...
DiscostewSM posted...
So then, prove you're correct on those numbers. It shouldn't be that hard if you were so willing to claim it as such. At least with VGChartz, they may not always be s***. Numbers from your ass are always s***ty.

No need. I already won this argument, shill. Maybe you'll get me next time.

Nope, you didn't, but nice try.


I hate to side with slyman19, but using VGChartz as a source for your claim indeed means that you lost the argument.
I'm trolling the Nintendo Switch board almost exclusively now - N_Guy_N exposing himself
Google is not a reliable site - N_Guy_N trying to save face
PS4always 23 hours ago#45
ponyseizures posted...
Worried for this updated port


Possibly, they might be using it to 'test the waters', although I wish they had picked GTA, even an old one like GTA:SA or Vice City would be insta-buy for me.
F2P/Freemium is a cancer on gaming.
Mr_Big_Boss 22 hours ago#46
ssjmole posted...
SplatterHouse55 posted...
donkeypunch1116 posted...
Let's be honest, most people aren't going to buy this game anyway. It's ages old and wasn't a heavy hitter when it released then. If It was GTA5, that may be a different story. Sure GTA5 is old as well, but it has legs and still sells to this day. LA does not. 

Hopefully Rockstar doesn't base it's support on a game that they know full and damn well wouldn't sell in the first place. In fact, the decision to bring this game to Switch in the first place baffles me, as they know everyone would rather just have GTA5 on the console. Guess we'll wait and see.


I think that L.A. Noire was chosen for the port, because it can actually fit on a Switch cartridge whereas GTA V could not. I think that the only way GTA V could work on the Switch is if it was digital-only. 

What is interesting is that Rockstar went with L.A. Noire instead of Red Dead Redemption, which could fit on a cart. Perhaps that could be the next game if L.A. Noire sells well.



But GTA V fit on 360 disc. It can fit on switch


That would require an overpriced 32gb card that sucks away all profit.
the end of one nightmare, prelude to the another...
Shenmue III
AG--05 19 hours ago#47
Hopefully they base it success on current install base. They can't be asking for unrealistic numbers. I'd say if it sells ~500k in its first few months I'd say that's a success considering that's about 10% of the current install base.
Bill:TANK! Francis:TANK!
Zoey:Tank! Louis:Pillz Here
Arcanine2009 19 hours ago#48
honestly, GTA 5 should have been the first game. An 11 year old port that is a niche franchise isn't the best way to test the waters.
Less is more. Everything you want, isn't everything you need.
Man, portable GTA V would be a best seller
Final Fantasy VI, Final Fantasy VII, Kingdom Hearts 3 and Dark Souls for Nintendo Switch!
Capcom, give us Monster Hunter XX for 3DS and Switch!
AG--05 19 hours ago#50
Arcanine2009 posted...
honestly, GTA 5 should have been the first game. An 11 year old port that is a niche franchise isn't the best way to test the waters.



EA seems to think otherwise with fifa 18...... That's bound to be missing features. And are using it as a testing ground. Again with possible missing features.
Bill:TANK! Francis:TANK!
Zoey:Tank! Louis:Pillz Here
  1. Boards
  2. Nintendo Switch
  3. Will Switch lose Rockstar support if L.A. Noire doesn't sell well?
    1. Boards
    2. Nintendo Switch
    3. Will Switch lose Rockstar support if L.A. Noire doesn't sell well?
    Portable GTA V would sell another 50m.
    GTA V single player would have worked on the Switch. GTA online would be way too gimped on the Switch.

    But Rockstar clearly proved that they stopped caring about GTA V single player years ago, let alone going back to strip things for the Switch version and deal with extra licencing issues. LA Noire is the easier port for them.
    Nintendo Switch Friend Code:
    0209837474242048207. Add me plz
    AG--05 posted...
    Arcanine2009 posted...
    honestly, GTA 5 should have been the first game. An 11 year old port that is a niche franchise isn't the best way to test the waters.



    EA seems to think otherwise with fifa 18...... That's bound to be missing features. And are using it as a testing ground. Again with possible missing features.

    Rockstar isn't EA, and at least Fifa 18 is a current gen port.. Not a 6 year old port.
    Less is more. Everything you want, isn't everything you need.
    AG--05 posted...
    EA seems to think otherwise with fifa 18...... That's bound to be missing features. And are using it as a testing ground. Again with possible missing features.


    the games are being made to see if switch has fifa fans that arent on one of the other systems. that would mostly be people who enjoy the main game or ultimate team which are usually the main draws of the game. If missing that one mode means a no buy its not very likely that person was going to get the game anyway.
    finally a new .Hack game! its been too long old friend.
    nephalim 1 day ago#55
    It is highly likely to sell better than the other systems.
    Rasputin77 1 day ago#56
    DiscostewSM posted...
    slyman19 posted...
    DiscostewSM posted...
    So then, prove you're correct on those numbers. It shouldn't be that hard if you were so willing to claim it as such. At least with VGChartz, they may not always be s***. Numbers from your ass are always s***ty.

    No need. I already won this argument, shill. Maybe you'll get me next time.

    Nope, you didn't, but nice try.

    E-peen: for guys with "lives" who have things to prove to complete strangers! So sexy. <3 

    AstralFrost posted...
    Yes, but then its unlikely the Switch will get any real 8th gen titles anyway, I mean this is just a 7th gen port.

    For as many people who usually jump directly in your lap every time you make a post, the truth sure seems to shut them the f*** up sometimes, doesn't it? ;)
    "They were like 11 year olds on the internet for the first time in the late 90's; NO idea how to handle criticism or negative opinions" - Kevin Smith
    El_Zaggy 23 hours ago#57
    pretty sure rdr2 and the next gta wont be able to run on the switch. I,m also pretty sure the next gta will be on the next generation of consoles
    (edited 23 hours ago)reportquote
    Usabell 23 hours ago#58
    AstralFrost posted...
    Yes, but then its unlikely the Switch will get any real 8th gen titles anyway, I mean this is just a 7th gen port.

    PS4 Pro won't get any real 9th gen titles like Super Mario Odyssey either...
    Consoles shouldn't be about 480p, 720p, 1080p or the prettiest slideshow.
    They're about a magical box that outputs wonderful streams of 60 images per second.
    MarioBro88 22 hours ago#59
    Rockstar went to my s*** list after they dropped all future single player add-ons in favor of of get-rich-quick multiplayer trash fo GTAV.

    f*** them.
    Switch: SW-1543-6664-2124
    PSN and Xbox: MacyG88
    Wes62 22 hours ago#60
    I think we can compare how it sells against the PS4 and X1 remasters.
    Sig
    alienfreaks04 21 hours ago#61
    LA Noire is.....fine.
    The game plays itself since it's planned out and you can't fail.
    FC: 3866-9130-9664
    PM me if you add me for Pkmn XY
    Baha05 21 hours ago#62
    slyman19 posted...
    Why wouldn't it?

    And number of reasons really, more so if the port runs bad on the system and consumers get word of that.
    "He may be Mr. Clean, but his soul will always be dirty!"
    DuranmanX4 21 hours ago#63
    Lose? There is nothing to lose, and everything to gain.
    Retail Wii U and 3DS games: https://sta.sh/02egamz324w0
    Retail PS4 and VITA games: https://sta.sh/09xbomh9bc4
    superbaboonmanX posted...
    It's a great game if nintendo fans can't see that maybe they don't deserve other rockstar games

    I owned the game back on 360.
    It's alright at best.
    Currently Playing :Mario X Rabbids: Battle Kingdom
    _Dog 21 hours ago#65
    @Rasputin77 posted...
    DiscostewSM posted...
    slyman19 posted...
    DiscostewSM posted...
    So then, prove you're correct on those numbers. It shouldn't be that hard if you were so willing to claim it as such. At least with VGChartz, they may not always be s***. Numbers from your ass are always s***ty.

    No need. I already won this argument, shill. Maybe you'll get me next time.

    Nope, you didn't, but nice try.

    E-peen: for guys with "lives" who have things to prove to complete strangers! So sexy. <3 

    AstralFrost posted...
    Yes, but then its unlikely the Switch will get any real 8th gen titles anyway, I mean this is just a 7th gen port.

    For as many people who usually jump directly in your lap every time you make a post, the truth sure seems to shut them the f*** up sometimes, doesn't it? ;)

    Hey, we have an "e-peen" right here parroting fake news!
    Corrin was a mistake.
    Not changing sig until Ash wins a Pokemon league, becomes a Pokemon Master and/or ends his journey. Started 12/14/2016
    rusty12000 21 hours ago#66
    I've never actually played it, so I'll probably pick it up.
    Everything EA contributed to gamers around the world in one youtube clip
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBoesEFWZnM
    Megaman Omega posted...
    DiscostewSM posted...
    slyman19 posted...
    DiscostewSM posted...
    So then, prove you're correct on those numbers. It shouldn't be that hard if you were so willing to claim it as such. At least with VGChartz, they may not always be s***. Numbers from your ass are always s***ty.

    No need. I already won this argument, shill. Maybe you'll get me next time.

    Nope, you didn't, but nice try.


    I hate to side with slyman19, but using VGChartz as a source for your claim indeed means that you lost the argument.



    You and sly man are a couple of clowns, sorry to say.
    You feeling like a star cas they sweat ya, well I'm feeling like a start cas I radiate light that will widen your retina
    DuranmanX4 20 hours ago#68
    XgovernmentAgen posted...
    You and sly man are a couple of clowns, sorry to say.

    Retail Wii U and 3DS games: https://sta.sh/02egamz324w0
    Retail PS4 and VITA games: https://sta.sh/09xbomh9bc4
    forte 20 hours ago#69
    slyman19 posted...
    DiscostewSM posted...
    slyman19 posted...
    DiscostewSM posted...
    With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?

    It's pretty dumb to compare support for those consoles and Nintendo consoles.

    Well, it's pretty dumb to assume that Switch would lose support and PS4/XB1 would not if this game sold poorly on all.

    Not at all. Xbox/PS gamers have proven time and time again that they'll buy most games. Devs are satisfied with the response from Xbox/PS gamers. They know there is a market for their games on those platforms. 

    Nintendo gamers on the other hand, have shown time and time again that they don't buy games outside of Nintendo and a select few third party devs. Devs can't trust Nintendo gamers like they can Xbox/PS gamers.

    The third party devs who have had immense success so far with third party releases on Switch may disagree with you...just sayin. Nice trolling attempt though.
    king_madden 19 hours ago#70
    forte posted...
    The third party devs who have had immense success so far with third party releases on Switch may disagree with you...just sayin. Nice trolling attempt though.


    your comment doesnt dispute his comment, he said a select few, and his post is correct. how is that trolling? it is a fact that devs are more likely to base nintendo support on a game by game basis, than they are the other systems.
    finally a new .Hack game! its been too long old friend.
    CLupula 13 hours ago#71
    DiscostewSM posted...
    slyman19 posted...
    DiscostewSM posted...
    With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?

    It's pretty dumb to compare support for those consoles and Nintendo consoles.

    Well, it's pretty dumb to assume that Switch would lose support and PS4/XB1 would not if this game sold poorly on all. It just means that there's no audience for this type of game anywhere, and that a different game may be more fitting.


    Your point is stupid. The Switch WILL lose support if L.A . Noire does not sell well. This is Rockstar's test of the system. They already sold millions and millions of GTAV on PS4 and XB1. I can guarantee you that if that didn't sell well, they would have stopped making PS4 and XB1 games, because that's how business works. If you were a grown up, you'd understand it.
    CLupula 13 hours ago#72
    forte posted...
    slyman19 posted...
    DiscostewSM posted...
    slyman19 posted...
    DiscostewSM posted...
    With all the people saying how bad the game is, if it doesn't sell well on either PS4/XB1, does that mean that those platforms will lose Rockstar support too?

    It's pretty dumb to compare support for those consoles and Nintendo consoles.

    Well, it's pretty dumb to assume that Switch would lose support and PS4/XB1 would not if this game sold poorly on all.

    Not at all. Xbox/PS gamers have proven time and time again that they'll buy most games. Devs are satisfied with the response from Xbox/PS gamers. They know there is a market for their games on those platforms. 

    Nintendo gamers on the other hand, have shown time and time again that they don't buy games outside of Nintendo and a select few third party devs. Devs can't trust Nintendo gamers like they can Xbox/PS gamers.

    The third party devs who have had immense success so far with third party releases on Switch may disagree with you...just sayin. Nice trolling attempt though.


    You should just stop talking. You sound dumber with every comment.
    1. Boards
    2. Nintendo Switch 
    3. Will Switch lose Rockstar support if L.A. Noire doesn't sell well?

No comments:

Post a Comment