Search

Friday, August 11, 2017

Port begging is not the same for the Switch

  1. Boards
  2. Nintendo Switch
  3. Port begging is not the same for the Switch
MarinaIsMyWaifu 11 hours ago#1
Normally port begging is silly/stupid because you can just buy the system it is already on.

But in this rare case, us Switch users LOVE the fact the Switch makes it so we can either

A. Relax in comfort and leisure in our favorite gaming spot, with a nice huge screen, great sound, our lights just right.

Or

B. Take it anywhere, bathroom, the party we didn't want to go to, work, engagement we were forced to attend, road trip, etc etc.

This makes the system so perfect for us, we HATE playing other systems now. The Switch is literally the future of gaming and every company will end up copying them.

Other day me and wife had to wait 45 minutes at dentist. Pulled out switch and we played Mario Kart together the entire time. Literally other people came and sat beside us and joined in.

So we're not begging because we are to cheap to buy the other system. We are saying we want a "Switch" version of the game we love. Because of how epic the Switch is.
Rolfin 11 hours ago#2
Most sane people know this already. It's just the vocal dissenters that try to make it shame-worthy.

There are some legitimately concerned people that think ports will somehow dissuade new titles, but I doubt it'll have little, if any, true impact on that
"Ignorance is bliss until they take your bliss away."
RockrrGirrl19 11 hours ago#3
I want every Wii U release to be ported to Switch.
SkuIItuIakid 11 hours ago#4
RockrrGirrl19 posted...
I want every Wii U release to be ported to Switch.
NDSVIP 11 hours ago#5
I think actually all switch games should be ported to Wii u instead. It seems like the Wii u can run them and mario Odyssey for example is the mario game we should've gotten instead of 3d world.

Not porting to Wii u makes it look like Nintendo are abandoning their fans. 

Porting to switch makes it look like Nintendo are lazy

Nintendo are doing the compete opposite thing
split screen multiplayer isn't a valid reason switch is a more console hybrid than PSP go because ANYONE can code it in PSP go - cyber akuma zero
(edited 11 hours ago)reportquote
MarinaIsMyWaifu 11 hours ago#6
SkuIItuIakid posted...
RockrrGirrl19 posted...
I want every Wii U release to be ported to Switch.
captsplatter_1 11 hours ago#7
Hardly doubt it will handle modern graphical intensive games. So ports is the best outcome. I'm already intending to get most of my indies on the Switch.
PSN: captsplatter & Gamertag: OGcaptsplatter
Switch FC: SW-3078-9578-8685 & Steam ID: splatter_1 or Captain Splatter
(edited 11 hours ago)reportquote
MarinaIsMyWaifu 11 hours ago#8
NDSVIP posted...
I think actually all switch games should be ported to Wii u instead. It seems like the Wii u can run them and mario Odyssey for example is the mario game we should've gotten instead of 3d world.

Not porting to Wii u makes it look like Nintendo are abandoning their fans. 

Porting to switch makes it look like Nintendo are lazy


Just do like I did and give the Wii U to your kids @_@.

Seriously kids are the best way to get rid of any old system without buyers remorse xD
captsplatter_1 11 hours ago#9
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
NDSVIP posted...
I think actually all switch games should be ported to Wii u instead. It seems like the Wii u can run them and mario Odyssey for example is the mario game we should've gotten instead of 3d world.

Not porting to Wii u makes it look like Nintendo are abandoning their fans. 

Porting to switch makes it look like Nintendo are lazy


Just do like I did and give the Wii U to your kids @_@.

Seriously kids are the best way to get rid of any old system without buyers remorse xD

And giving Gamestop the finger.
PSN: captsplatter & Gamertag: OGcaptsplatter
Switch FC: SW-3078-9578-8685 & Steam ID: splatter_1 or Captain Splatter
NDSVIP 11 hours ago#10
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
NDSVIP posted...
I think actually all switch games should be ported to Wii u instead. It seems like the Wii u can run them and mario Odyssey for example is the mario game we should've gotten instead of 3d world.

Not porting to Wii u makes it look like Nintendo are abandoning their fans. 

Porting to switch makes it look like Nintendo are lazy


Just do like I did and give the Wii U to your kids @_@.

Seriously kids are the best way to get rid of any old system without buyers remorse xD

Why would I want to get rid of Wii u it's still the best console this gen including switch, for now and the foreseeable future
split screen multiplayer isn't a valid reason switch is a more console hybrid than PSP go because ANYONE can code it in PSP go - cyber akuma zero
(edited 11 hours ago)reportquote
Megaman Omega 11 hours ago#11
I agree, because porting a game from a home console to a handheld is worth it in my opinion. The portability aspect alone make it worth it. It's different than porting the game from a HD come console to another HD home console with slightly better graphics.
I'm trolling the Nintendo Switch board almost exclusively now - N_Guy_N exposing himself
Google is not a reliable site - N_Guy_N trying to save face
fernantendo 11 hours ago#12
I can see the point. 

Is not that we want a Switch port of a game. But rather that we want a HD portable version of the game.

I'm in the same camp. And why for third-party games that come out on Switch and other systems, I will buy on Switch even if graphically inferior. Portability is too big a factor to ignore.
Let's get ON with it! - Bill from The Last of Us
barrabaCHHS 11 hours ago#13
Rolfin posted...
There are some legitimately concerned people that think ports will somehow dissuade new titles, but I doubt it'll have little, if any, true impact on that

I think this is a fair concern when it comes to games like Mario Kart and Smash Bros, which have always had one game per system, Mario Kart even makes notes of this with the naming of retro courses, SNES Mario Circuit and GCN Baby Park, not Super Mario Circuit or DD Baby Park. It makes me worry if Switch will actually get its own Mario Kart.

Smash Bros port would also feel pointless and outdated. We have many new games from core franchises that should be shown off in Smash and having two smash games on the system makes the other redundant. We should get a new Smash Bros with a 2019 or 2020 release.
Switch Friend code SW-1447-3440-8035
Let it be known that I think the Switch will get a brand new Smash game instead of a port.
krazychao5 11 hours ago#14
barrabaCHHS posted...
Rolfin posted...
There are some legitimately concerned people that think ports will somehow dissuade new titles, but I doubt it'll have little, if any, true impact on that

I think this is a fair concern when it comes to games like Mario Kart and Smash Bros, which have always had one game per system, Mario Kart even makes notes of this with the naming of retro courses, SNES Mario Circuit and GCN Baby Park, not Super Mario Circuit or DD Baby Park. It makes me worry if Switch will actually get its own Mario Kart.

Smash Bros port would also feel pointless and outdated. We have many new games from core franchises that should be shown off in Smash and having two smash games on the system makes the other redundant. We should get a new Smash Bros with a 2019 or 2020 release.

Maps could all say Wii U Rainbow Road, Wii U Bowser Castle, because they were, for all intents and purposes, Wii U tracks.
MarinaIsMyWaifu 11 hours ago#15
barrabaCHHS posted...
Rolfin posted...
There are some legitimately concerned people that think ports will somehow dissuade new titles, but I doubt it'll have little, if any, true impact on that

I think this is a fair concern when it comes to games like Mario Kart and Smash Bros, which have always had one game per system, Mario Kart even makes notes of this with the naming of retro courses, SNES Mario Circuit and GCN Baby Park, not Super Mario Circuit or DD Baby Park. It makes me worry if Switch will actually get its own Mario Kart.

Smash Bros port would also feel pointless and outdated. We have many new games from core franchises that should be shown off in Smash and having two smash games on the system makes the other redundant. We should get a new Smash Bros with a 2019 or 2020 release.



Honestly I think Nintendo should take the "DLC" route for sequels. 

Imagine in 2 years they just release MASSIVE DLC overhauls for these games. Would be even better than getting a sequel.
ikki5 11 hours ago#16
I honestly don't see the difference between "port begging" on the Switch vs anything else really. You have the claim it is more because you can take it to your favourite gaming spot but really, what if your favourite gaming spot is your living room on your couch? Does that mean it is not the same for people doing it for the Xbox or PS4 because they want it for their system so they can play a game in their favourite spot? Really, port begging is still port begging regardless if your system is a handheld or a home console and you can't just say it counts for one thing but not the other simply because of your own preference.
| PSN - JSampG / NNID - Sampsonj | Toadette of the MK8 Deluxe board
"27,146 sales is a decrease from 26,114 sales (Paraphrase)" - Linetrix
(edited 11 hours ago)reportquote
MarinaIsMyWaifu 10 hours ago#17
ikki5 posted...
I honestly don't see the difference between "port begging" on the Switch vs anything else really. You have the claim it is more because you can take it to your favourite gaming spot but really, what if your favourite gaming spot is your living room on your couch? Does that mean it is not the same for people doing it for the Xbox or PS4 because they want it for their system so they can play a game in their favourite spot? Really, port begging is still port begging regardless if your system is a handheld or a home console and you can't just say it counts for one thing but not the other simply because of your own preference.


You are wrong it's not about just taking it to your favorite spot. It's about taking it to spots you hate too. It's even better their as then you have something you love to help pass the time.
OpIvy 10 hours ago#18
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
barrabaCHHS posted...
Rolfin posted...
There are some legitimately concerned people that think ports will somehow dissuade new titles, but I doubt it'll have little, if any, true impact on that

I think this is a fair concern when it comes to games like Mario Kart and Smash Bros, which have always had one game per system, Mario Kart even makes notes of this with the naming of retro courses, SNES Mario Circuit and GCN Baby Park, not Super Mario Circuit or DD Baby Park. It makes me worry if Switch will actually get its own Mario Kart.

Smash Bros port would also feel pointless and outdated. We have many new games from core franchises that should be shown off in Smash and having two smash games on the system makes the other redundant. We should get a new Smash Bros with a 2019 or 2020 release.



Honestly I think Nintendo should take the "DLC" route for sequels. 

Imagine in 2 years they just release MASSIVE DLC overhauls for these games. Would be even better than getting a sequel.

Nintendo already hides content behind amiibos that people have a difficult time finding for a reasonable price. Your dlc fantasy is both unreasonable and anti-consumer.
If you ever need a street date broken, go to Target and find Ron. He's new but at least tries to be cool...just ask Xplode-
MarinaIsMyWaifu 10 hours ago#19
OpIvy posted...
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
barrabaCHHS posted...
Rolfin posted...
There are some legitimately concerned people that think ports will somehow dissuade new titles, but I doubt it'll have little, if any, true impact on that

I think this is a fair concern when it comes to games like Mario Kart and Smash Bros, which have always had one game per system, Mario Kart even makes notes of this with the naming of retro courses, SNES Mario Circuit and GCN Baby Park, not Super Mario Circuit or DD Baby Park. It makes me worry if Switch will actually get its own Mario Kart.

Smash Bros port would also feel pointless and outdated. We have many new games from core franchises that should be shown off in Smash and having two smash games on the system makes the other redundant. We should get a new Smash Bros with a 2019 or 2020 release.



Honestly I think Nintendo should take the "DLC" route for sequels. 

Imagine in 2 years they just release MASSIVE DLC overhauls for these games. Would be even better than getting a sequel.

Nintendo already hides content behind amiibos that people have a difficult time finding for a reasonable price. Your dlc fantasy is both unreasonable and anti-consumer.


Still very likely to happen, with all the money they are making off DLC lately ^_^
OpIvy 10 hours ago#20
ikki5 posted...
I honestly don't see the difference between "port begging" on the Switch vs anything else really. You have the claim it is more because you can take it to your favourite gaming spot but really, what if your favourite gaming spot is your living room on your couch? Does that mean it is not the same for people doing it for the Xbox or PS4 because they want it for their system so they can play a game in their favourite spot? Really, port begging is still port begging regardless if your system is a handheld or a home console and you can't just say it counts for one thing but not the other simply because of your own preference.

This guy gets it.
If you ever need a street date broken, go to Target and find Ron. He's new but at least tries to be cool...just ask Xplode-
OpIvy 10 hours ago#21
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
OpIvy posted...
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
barrabaCHHS posted...
Rolfin posted...
There are some legitimately concerned people that think ports will somehow dissuade new titles, but I doubt it'll have little, if any, true impact on that

I think this is a fair concern when it comes to games like Mario Kart and Smash Bros, which have always had one game per system, Mario Kart even makes notes of this with the naming of retro courses, SNES Mario Circuit and GCN Baby Park, not Super Mario Circuit or DD Baby Park. It makes me worry if Switch will actually get its own Mario Kart.

Smash Bros port would also feel pointless and outdated. We have many new games from core franchises that should be shown off in Smash and having two smash games on the system makes the other redundant. We should get a new Smash Bros with a 2019 or 2020 release.



Honestly I think Nintendo should take the "DLC" route for sequels. 

Imagine in 2 years they just release MASSIVE DLC overhauls for these games. Would be even better than getting a sequel.

Nintendo already hides content behind amiibos that people have a difficult time finding for a reasonable price. Your dlc fantasy is both unreasonable and anti-consumer.


Still very likely to happen, with all the money they are making off DLC lately ^_^

Not likely at all.
If you ever need a street date broken, go to Target and find Ron. He's new but at least tries to be cool...just ask Xplode-
MarinaIsMyWaifu 10 hours ago#22
OpIvy posted...
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
OpIvy posted...
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
barrabaCHHS posted...
Rolfin posted...
There are some legitimately concerned people that think ports will somehow dissuade new titles, but I doubt it'll have little, if any, true impact on that

I think this is a fair concern when it comes to games like Mario Kart and Smash Bros, which have always had one game per system, Mario Kart even makes notes of this with the naming of retro courses, SNES Mario Circuit and GCN Baby Park, not Super Mario Circuit or DD Baby Park. It makes me worry if Switch will actually get its own Mario Kart.

Smash Bros port would also feel pointless and outdated. We have many new games from core franchises that should be shown off in Smash and having two smash games on the system makes the other redundant. We should get a new Smash Bros with a 2019 or 2020 release.



Honestly I think Nintendo should take the "DLC" route for sequels. 

Imagine in 2 years they just release MASSIVE DLC overhauls for these games. Would be even better than getting a sequel.

Nintendo already hides content behind amiibos that people have a difficult time finding for a reasonable price. Your dlc fantasy is both unreasonable and anti-consumer.


Still very likely to happen, with all the money they are making off DLC lately ^_^

Not likely at all.


We'll see in 2 years who was right =P
Blayshy 10 hours ago#23
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
SkuIItuIakid posted...
RockrrGirrl19 posted...
I want every Wii U release to be ported to Switch.

Not possible.
Uh... A-Are you sure to interact with others?
-Mario, Ganondorf, Sonic, Bowser Jr. / Wendy, Duck Hunt, Marth, Mewtwo Mainer.
Sent1nat0r 10 hours ago#24
NDSVIP posted...
I think actually all switch games should be ported to Wii u instead. It seems like the Wii u can run them and mario Odyssey for example is the mario game we should've gotten instead of 3d world.

Not porting to Wii u makes it look like Nintendo are abandoning their fans. 

Porting to switch makes it look like Nintendo are lazy

Nintendo are doing the compete opposite thing

The false claims in this. First porting is either done by smaller teams or is outsourced to another studio completely. Second I want to play my Wii U games on Switch and you have no right to deny me. Third Sony are the kings of this practice and made it take off in the first place.

Watch this person ignore me posting the facts.
Pharsti01 10 hours ago#25
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
we HATE playing other systems now


So, it's, at the end, still just random hate right?

Yeah, no, port begging is hilarious and stupid.
NDSVIP 10 hours ago#26
Sent1nat0r posted...
NDSVIP posted...
I think actually all switch games should be ported to Wii u instead. It seems like the Wii u can run them and mario Odyssey for example is the mario game we should've gotten instead of 3d world.

Not porting to Wii u makes it look like Nintendo are abandoning their fans. 

Porting to switch makes it look like Nintendo are lazy

Nintendo are doing the compete opposite thing

The false claims in this. First porting is either done by smaller teams or is outsourced to another studio completely. Second I want to play my Wii U games on Switch and you have no right to deny me. Third Sony are the kings of this practice and made it take off in the first place.

Watch this person ignore me posting the facts.


I didn't say is Nintendo being lazy, I said makes it look like. And until Nintendo announce actual sequels instead of just ports it will continue to look like so

And I don't know why you're bringing Sony into this when they have nothing to do with it. Sony can port all they want, doesn't excuse Nintendo
split screen multiplayer isn't a valid reason switch is a more console hybrid than PSP go because ANYONE can code it in PSP go - cyber akuma zero
(edited 10 hours ago)reportquote
daniel1232323 10 hours ago#27
Right. I agree completely. I know resident evil 4 has been ported a million times over. I want my first truly portable re4. Me and my friend love re4 and would put our tvs together and race through that game. Having 2 switches with that game would make hanging out and playing that game more fun. Re5 would benefit that play style as well

Its nice to have a game to play in your hands when your gf takes the tv over(im playing megaman legacy 2 on ps4 and im currently having that problem). or you have to go on a long road trip or plane trip. Or you can play games between calls at your call center job. Its nifty.
you want mother in america? don't you know? it doesn't exist.
Braev 10 hours ago#28
I don't see anything wrong with port "begging" to begin with, since what is commonly labelled as such on here isn't usually much more than just showing interest in a game being ported to whatever system.
There's a mystery to be uncovered here, that's for sure. And I get the feeling the truth is beyond my wildest imagination.
Spade59 10 hours ago#29
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
Normally port begging is silly/stupid because you can just buy the system it is already on.

But in this rare case

EmkfMSs
metroidman18 10 hours ago#30
Two sides to the port begging issue:

1. Salty WiiU owners who dont understand why Nintendo would port a WiiU game for a massive audience that skipped the WiiU

2. People who want current PS4/xbox games ported to the Switch since the Switch has enough teraflops and all it takes is a simple graphics downgrade
psn: edwinc8811
Sent1nat0r 10 hours ago#31
NDSVIP posted...
Sent1nat0r posted...
NDSVIP posted...
I think actually all switch games should be ported to Wii u instead. It seems like the Wii u can run them and mario Odyssey for example is the mario game we should've gotten instead of 3d world.

Not porting to Wii u makes it look like Nintendo are abandoning their fans. 

Porting to switch makes it look like Nintendo are lazy

Nintendo are doing the compete opposite thing

The false claims in this. First porting is either done by smaller teams or is outsourced to another studio completely. Second I want to play my Wii U games on Switch and you have no right to deny me. Third Sony are the kings of this practice and made it take off in the first place.

Watch this person ignore me posting the facts.


I didn't say is Nintendo being lazy, I said makes it look like. And until Nintendo announce actual sequels instead of just ports it will continue to look like so

And I don't know why you're bringing Sony into this when they have nothing to do with it. Sony can port all they want, doesn't excuse Nintendo

Splatoon 2 is a sequel. I brought Sony up because they are ultimately to blame for this practice today. Nintendo only ever did it in the background on things like GBA. It is Sony to blame for making it so common.

The port complaints are pointless.

I completely miss my Wii U and actually regretted initially buying Switch because Wii U's exclusives are definitely among the best Nintendo have ever made. Keeping them exclusive to Wii U benefits nobody. Wii U owners don't lose anything and people who upgraded like me and want to play them get to play at least some of them.

If I get to play Pikmin 3 or Woolly World as nature intended again I'll have to wait and see.
ikki5 10 hours ago#32
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
ikki5 posted...
I honestly don't see the difference between "port begging" on the Switch vs anything else really. You have the claim it is more because you can take it to your favourite gaming spot but really, what if your favourite gaming spot is your living room on your couch? Does that mean it is not the same for people doing it for the Xbox or PS4 because they want it for their system so they can play a game in their favourite spot? Really, port begging is still port begging regardless if your system is a handheld or a home console and you can't just say it counts for one thing but not the other simply because of your own preference.


You are wrong it's not about just taking it to your favorite spot. It's about taking it to spots you hate too. It's even better their as then you have something you love to help pass the time.



Again, that is still all just a preference. Why should your preference be more important than someone else? Seriously, this is just another example where it is wrong unless it's Nintendo.
| PSN - JSampG / NNID - Sampsonj | Toadette of the MK8 Deluxe board
"27,146 sales is a decrease from 26,114 sales (Paraphrase)" - Linetrix
(edited 9 hours ago)reportquote
NDSVIP 10 hours ago#33
Sent1nat0r posted...
NDSVIP posted...
Sent1nat0r posted...
NDSVIP posted...
I think actually all switch games should be ported to Wii u instead. It seems like the Wii u can run them and mario Odyssey for example is the mario game we should've gotten instead of 3d world.

Not porting to Wii u makes it look like Nintendo are abandoning their fans. 

Porting to switch makes it look like Nintendo are lazy

Nintendo are doing the compete opposite thing

The false claims in this. First porting is either done by smaller teams or is outsourced to another studio completely. Second I want to play my Wii U games on Switch and you have no right to deny me. Third Sony are the kings of this practice and made it take off in the first place.

Watch this person ignore me posting the facts.


I didn't say is Nintendo being lazy, I said makes it look like. And until Nintendo announce actual sequels instead of just ports it will continue to look like so

And I don't know why you're bringing Sony into this when they have nothing to do with it. Sony can port all they want, doesn't excuse Nintendo

Splatoon 2 is a sequel. I brought Sony up because they are ultimately to blame for this practice today. Nintendo only ever did it in the background on things like GBA. It is Sony to blame for making it so common.

The port complaints are pointless.

I completely miss my Wii U and actually regretted initially buying Switch because Wii U's exclusives are definitely among the best Nintendo have ever made. Keeping them exclusive to Wii U benefits nobody. Wii U owners don't lose anything and people who upgraded like me and want to play them get to play at least some of them.

If I get to play Pikmin 3 or Woolly World as nature intended again I'll have to wait and see.


I know splatoon 2 is a sequel, but to me looking at switch exclusives alone the console is underwhelming.

And I think part of the reason is Wii u ports, and that's not something that can be disproven. If mk8d or botw switch didn't exist, I think mk9 and Zelda switch would have been announced by now. At least it should have

This could all change if by the end of this year Nintendo actually announce more switch exclusives like this but I don't see that happening
split screen multiplayer isn't a valid reason switch is a more console hybrid than PSP go because ANYONE can code it in PSP go - cyber akuma zero
(edited 9 hours ago)reportquote
Larpnugger 9 hours ago#34
metroidman18 posted...
Two sides to the port begging issue:

1. Salty WiiU owners who dont understand why Nintendo would port a WiiU game for a massive audience that skipped the WiiU

2. People who want current PS4/xbox games ported to the Switch since the Switch has enough teraflops and all it takes is a simple graphics downgrade


Just because a game gets ported to a system with a larger user base doesn't mean it will be successful because of it. Look at the sales of the wiiu hyrule warriors vs legends. 

Also there are more wiiu's out there than switches......
amerk 8 hours ago#35
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
This makes the system so perfect for us, we HATE playing other systems now. The Switch is literally the future of gaming and every company will end up copying them.


Until you get people to stop spouting off how the Switch is just a secondary console (implying they have other systems that are most likely not portable they'd rather game on) or that the Switch doesn't need 3rd party AAA games (implying that even if developers were to port some of these games over, there may not be much of an interest in buying them), it's going to be an upward battle getting developers more invested in the Switch.

Developers have used every excuse in the book (lacks power, too much effort, won't work) but I personally think it's because they don't want to take the risk that it won't sell. And when you have people with attitudes like the ones I suggested in the paragraph above, all they're hearing is that the game may not be quite as popular as they hoped on the Switch.
(edited 8 hours ago)reportquote
emagdnE 8 hours ago#36
I want every Wii U release to be ported to Switch.

And as someone who rejected Wii U but is interested in Super Mario Odyssey, that would turn me off from Switch.

I'd rather have proper Nintendo games again and not a Wii U 2 + Odyssey adapter.

We're getting a real 3D Mario again. So let's get a real Paper Mario instead of Sticker Star 2: Paint Boogaloo DX.
I've never seen anything this beautiful in the entire galaxy... All right, give me the bomb. -Ultra Magnus
(edited 8 hours ago)reportquote
bbivens 8 hours ago#37
NDSVIP posted...
I think actually all switch games should be ported to Wii u instead. It seems like the Wii u can run them and mario Odyssey for example is the mario game we should've gotten instead of 3d world.

Not porting to Wii u makes it look like Nintendo are abandoning their fans. 

Porting to switch makes it look like Nintendo are lazy

Nintendo are doing the compete opposite thing


right... because all manufacturers continue supporting 6 year old systems after they release a new one... What was Nintendo thinking?
Every US Nintendo ever (sans virtual boy)... 
friend code SW-7237-8679-1684 - user name Flint Lkwd (Cloudy w/a chance)
kranix1 7 hours ago#38
MarinaIsMyWaifu posted...
NDSVIP posted...
I think actually all switch games should be ported to Wii u instead. It seems like the Wii u can run them and mario Odyssey for example is the mario game we should've gotten instead of 3d world.

Not porting to Wii u makes it look like Nintendo are abandoning their fans. 

Porting to switch makes it look like Nintendo are lazy


Just do like I did and give the Wii U to your kids @_@.

Seriously kids are the best way to get rid of any old system without buyers remorse xD


So...you agree with him, or are you not smart enough to try and defend your own argument?
Literally if it wasn't Nintendo I would return the god damn thing and never f***ing buy another Nintendo product again.- hilliet
Titanfail2017 7 hours ago#39
Larpnugger posted...
metroidman18 posted...
Two sides to the port begging issue:

1. Salty WiiU owners who dont understand why Nintendo would port a WiiU game for a massive audience that skipped the WiiU

2. People who want current PS4/xbox games ported to the Switch since the Switch has enough teraflops and all it takes is a simple graphics downgrade


Just because a game gets ported to a system with a larger user base doesn't mean it will be successful because of it. Look at the sales of the wiiu hyrule warriors vs legends. 

Also there are more wiiu's out there than switches......

Because the only real way to play hyrule warriors, mario maker and woolly world is on wii u
NDSVIP 6 hours ago#40
bbivens posted...
NDSVIP posted...
I think actually all switch games should be ported to Wii u instead. It seems like the Wii u can run them and mario Odyssey for example is the mario game we should've gotten instead of 3d world.

Not porting to Wii u makes it look like Nintendo are abandoning their fans. 

Porting to switch makes it look like Nintendo are lazy

Nintendo are doing the compete opposite thing


right... because all manufacturers continue supporting 6 year old systems after they release a new one... What was Nintendo thinking?

Wii u is not 6 years old barely even 5
split screen multiplayer isn't a valid reason switch is a more console hybrid than PSP go because ANYONE can code it in PSP go - cyber akuma zero
(edited 6 hours ago)reportquote
NeoMonk 6 hours ago#41
I'll leave this here:

USER INFO: MARINAISMYWAIFU
User is no longer an active member.
"The Xbox One board isn't the place for personal anecdotes, joke topics or fanboy affair." -Gamefaqs Moderator
quickposter 6 hours ago#42
Is the username MarinaIsStillMyWaifu in use yet?
  1. Boards
  2. Nintendo Switch 
  3. Port begging is not the same for the Switch

No comments:

Post a Comment