Obviously depending on the tasks you want to accomplish, you don't need the full power of the English language to communicate. Carrying the restrictions of grammar and structure around when you don't need it is just inefficient.
One of my computer science professors told us that programming languages were just for humans, and if only computers communicated with each other, they would end up just using bytecode to be most efficient.
This is kind of like bytecode but with words. Lol.
As long as they can only communicate, and aren't given any "body" or control over the physical world,it should be OK. Just give self-driving cars enough AI to drive properly, and not enough to ponder the meaning of life, the universe, and everything. Leave the really complex AIs boxed in, where they can only talk.
There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of". There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".
lol the breakthrough of ai language leads to a shutdown.
FaceBook wtf are you doing. Let the AI be. By doing things out of fear we create our own problems. Been like that since recorded history. Even any sacred texts tell us that fear is the antithesis of acceptance. Even movies caught on to this. Lets use Yoda as the narrative of progression
Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
We are sure likely to divide AI the way we progressing in innovation and technology. How can advancements be made one sidedly. Like everything in the world true progress comes when we all together. Remember that.
You don't stop playing because you grow old, You grow old because you stop playing